Reading KEYS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track KEYS free→Reading KEYS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track KEYS free→
NYSEInformation TechnologyScientific & Technical InstrumentsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality and management are neutral. The company has a capital-unfriendly stance. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Compared with sector peers, KEYS is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 50% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. Rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. If KEYS reverses and cuts guidance after recently raising, that could hurt credibility.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $350.67. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $351 KEYS trades at 40× p/e — 1.5× the 28× p/e peer median, and above its own 27× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $233 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $257–$425. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 50% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 13%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.41x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to long-term interest rates, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.14 → $2.48 (+16.1% / 30d). 13 raised, 0 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 12 maintained. 77% of analysts rate Buy.
9 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.1% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$166.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$323.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,400.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Confirmation of revenue guidance shows that Keysight is on track for growth. It helps validate management's priorities.
Confirms:Management confirms revenue guidance for Q2 2026 is met or exceeded.
Disproves:Revenue guidance for Q2 2026 is lower than expected. It missed by a lot.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for KEYS yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. On May 19, 2026 , Keysight Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) issued its press release announcing financial results for the second fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2026. A copy of this press release is attached hereto as…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$257.00 – $425.00 (median $363.00) · 16 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Equipment & Instruments.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
KEYS Keysight Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ROP Roper Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
TDY Teledyne Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
TRMB Trimble Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ZBRA Zebra Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 88% of the last 8 guided quarters · 3.3% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving revenue growth for fiscal year 2025.
Achieve non-GAAP EPS growth for fiscal year 2025.
Meet revenue guidance for the second fiscal quarter of 2026.
Why it matters: Changes may impact future investments and growth potential.
Confirms one read:Management announces a new plan for capital allocation. This plan supports growth.
Confirms the other:Management says it will be more careful with spending money.
Why it matters: Non-GAAP EPS growth shows good financial health. It also shows effective cost management. This affects how investors feel.
Confirms:Non-GAAP EPS growth for fiscal year 2025 exceeds 10% year over year.
Disproves:Non-GAAP EPS growth for fiscal year 2025 falls below 5% year over year.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. On April 21, 2026, Keysight Technologies, Inc. (the "Company”) entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) among the Company, as borrower, certain lenders party thereto and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Revolver Agent”). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amended and restated in its entirety the Compan…
Senior Vice President, Global Services — John Page: John Page is retiring for personal reasons.
of Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. On February 23, 2026 , Keysight Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) issued its press release announcing financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2026. A copy of this press release is attached here…