Reading YUM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track YUM free→Reading YUM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track YUM free→NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryRestaurantsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is fragile, and management is volatile. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate. Compared with sector peers, YUM is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 14% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $154.31. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $154 YUM trades at 24× p/e, in line with its 21× p/e peer median. Our $135 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $168–$190. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 14% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 14%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.16x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.57 → $1.57 (+0.2% / 30d). 3 raised, 1 cut, 24 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 43% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 26.2% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$87.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$204.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,283.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Confidence changed from 'medium' to 'high'.
As of June 12, 2026, confidence rose. The sector backdrop remained a headwind. Recent financial performance was strong, while risk was moderate. Earnings quality was described as fragile, and management was noted as volatile.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in same-store sales growth could signal weakening demand for Yum! Brands' products.
Confirms:Q2 same-store sales grew less than 5%.
Disproves:Q2 same-store sales growth reported at or above 5%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for YUM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Operating Officer and Chief People & Culture Officer — Tracy Skeans: Tracy Skeans is transitioning from her roles and retiring, with a transition period and compensation agreement.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$168.00 – $190.00 (median $180.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-06-03
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Restaurants.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
YUM Yum! Brands | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
MCD McDonald's | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | full | moderate |
SBUX Starbucks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
DRI Darden Restaurants | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | fair | moderate |
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=486).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Yum! Brands aims to increase its unit count by 5% annually.
Yum! Brands targets a 7% growth in system sales, excluding foreign exchange impacts.
Yum! Brands aims for at least 8% growth in core operating profit annually.
Why it matters: GDP growth affects consumer spending, which impacts Yum! Brands' sales.
Confirms one read:GDP growth reported above 2% in the second estimate.
Confirms the other:GDP growth reported below 1%.
Why it matters: Meeting the 7% sales growth target shows strong sales across all brands.
Confirms:Q2 system sales growth reported at or above 7%.
Disproves:Q2 system sales growth reported below 7%.
Why it matters: Exceeding unit growth targets would show Yum! Brands is expanding effectively despite market headwinds.
Confirms:Reported unit growth in Q2 exceeds 5%.
Disproves:Unit growth reported below 5% in Q2.
Why it matters: An 8% growth in core operating profit shows better cost control and more profit.
Confirms:Q2 core operating profit growth reported at or above 8%.
Disproves:In Q2, core operating profit growth was below 8%.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 29, 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. ( “ YUM ” ) issued a press release announcing financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.
Director — Kathleen K. Oberg: Appointment of a new director effective April 1, 2026.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 4, 2026, Yum! Brands, Inc. issued a press release announcing financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. Section 9 – Financial Statements and Exhibits
Director — Keith Barr: Mr. Barr resigned from the Board to take on a new leadership position outside of YUM.