Reading WWW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WWW free→Reading WWW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WWW free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryFootwear & AccessoriesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well-supported by cash. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind, although WWW trades above typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 24% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and the performance of sector bellwethers like NKE and DECK, as these could significantly impact WWW's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $18.02. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $18 WWW trades at 13× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $23 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 21% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted -1.06x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.36 → $0.38 (+4.1% / 30d). 6 raised, 2 cut, 10 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 55% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 57.8% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 2 guided quarters · 49.7% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$181.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$455.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,461.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong growth in international sales shows good global brand strategies.
Confirms:International revenue grew by more than 12.8% year over year.
Disproves:International revenue grew by less than 10% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for WWW yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 14, 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the Company’s first quarter of 2026, attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K (the “8-K”), which is hereby incorporated by reference. This 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by refe…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Footwear.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WWW Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | fair | elevated |
DECK Deckers Brands | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CROX Crocs | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
WEYS Weyco Group, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to drive revenue growth across key segments and geographies.
Maintain or improve gross profit margins through strategic pricing and cost management.
Focus on increasing operating income through cost efficiencies and revenue growth.
Why it matters: Better sector performance could help Wolverine grow.
Confirms:Sector performance turns positive over the next 60 days.
Disproves:Sector performance remains negative over the next 60 days.
Why it matters: Higher operating income means better control of costs. It also shows more efficiency.
Confirms:Operating income was over $35M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income was below $30M in Q2.
Why it matters: A steady gross margin shows good cost management during price challenges.
Confirms:Gross margin reported at or above 46.4% in Q2.
Disproves:Gross margin reported below 46.0% in Q2.
Why it matters: Exceeding this growth rate would signal strong demand and effective brand strategies.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported above 5.9% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 4.6% year over year.
Why it matters: A higher operating margin means the company is more efficient. It also shows better cost control.
Confirms:The operating margin was above 9.2% in Q2.
Disproves:The operating margin was below 8.8% in Q2.