Reading WSM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WSM free→Reading WSM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WSM free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionarySpecialty RetailSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been neutral, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a headwind, suggesting challenges in the market. Peer multiples imply a price about 37% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. Key factors to watch include any guidance cuts from WSM and the performance of sector bellwethers like ULTA, DKS, and TSCO. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $223.54. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $224 WSM trades at 25× p/e — 1.4× the 18× p/e peer median, and above its own 14× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $170 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $185–$230. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 32% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.24x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.03 → $2.04 (+0.5% / 30d). 5 raised, 5 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 7 maintained. 41% of analysts rate Buy.
7 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 6.7% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$148.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$308.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,329.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation dimension changed and became expensive. The sector backdrop fell, indicating a headwind for the company. The recent financial performance remained strong, while risk was moderate. The management dimension remained neutral.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop below 2.7% would signal weaker demand and hurt investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 2.7%.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported above 6.7%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for WSM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 21, 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing the Company’s financial results for its first quarter ended May 3, 2026. A copy of the Company’s press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1. The attached exhibit is provided under
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$185.00 – $230.00 (median $196.00) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-05-29
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Consumer Discretionary (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 54 of 100 | full | moderate |
AMZN Amazon | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
HD Home Depot (The) | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | full | moderate |
MCD McDonald's | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | full | moderate |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=646).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to focus on maintaining an operating margin between 17.5% and 18.1% for fiscal 2026.
Aim to achieve revenue growth between 2.7% and 6.7% for fiscal 2026.
The Board of Directors authorized a 15% increase in the quarterly cash dividend.
Why it matters: Retail sales data will show if consumer spending is getting better or worse.
Confirms one read:June retail sales report shows growth above 4%.
Confirms the other:June retail sales report shows decline or growth below 2%.
Why it matters: A confirmed increase would show strong cash flow and commitment to returning value to shareholders.
Confirms:They announced a dividend increase of more than 15%.
Disproves:No dividend increase announced or a lower increase than 15%.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it shows worse cost management. This puts profit under pressure.
Confirms:The operating margin is less than 17.5%.
Disproves:The operating margin is more than 17.5%.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On March 18, 2026, the Company issued a press release announcing the Company’s financial results for its fourth quarter and fiscal year ended February 1, 2026. A copy of the Company’s press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1. The attached exhibit is provided under
Other Events On March 18, 2026, the Company issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors authorized a 15% increase in the Company’s quarterly cash dividend. A copy of the Company’s press release is attached as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On November 19, 2025, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing the Company’s financial results for its third quarter ended November 2, 2025. A copy of the Company’s press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1. The attached exhibit is provided under
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On June 26, 2025, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into that certain Ninth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Agent”), letter of credit issuer and swingline lender, and the lenders party thereto, which amended and restated that certain Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2021 (as amended, the “Existing Credit…