Reading WKC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WKC free→Reading WKC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WKC free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas Refining & MarketingSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
WKC shows weak recent financial performance and is currently unprofitable, which limits the assessment of its earnings quality. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate, while its earnings yield is above typical for the sector. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers like VLO, MPC, and PSX. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $31.72. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $32 WKC trades at 15× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $32 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 1% below a flat-multiple fair value, ahead of our forecast of about -13%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated weak grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=979).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.23x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.56 → $0.71 (+28.5% / 30d). 2 raised, 0 cut, 3 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 33% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 1 guided quarters · -44.4% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$99.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$216.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,254.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'full' to 'fair'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong gross profit growth shows good execution and demand in core businesses.
Confirms:Q2 gross profit growth exceeds 15% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 gross profit growth is 15% or lower year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for WKC yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 23, 2026, World Kinect Corporation issued a press release reporting its financial results for the first quarter of 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. This information and the information contained in Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Ac…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WKC World Kinect Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | fair | moderate |
VLO Valero Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | full | moderate |
MPC Marathon Petroleum | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | full | moderate |
PSX Phillips 66 | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | full | moderate |
DINO HF Sinclair | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on enhancing gross profit through operational efficiencies and strategic initiatives.
Aim to enhance net income through cost management and revenue growth.
Continue efforts to increase operating income through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth picks up, it could benefit World Kinect. It shows a healthier market environment.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth is speeding up again. It is above 6% year over year.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth remains below 6% year over year.
Why it matters: Higher operating income means better efficiency and control of costs. It shows how well the company is doing.
Confirms:Q2 operating income exceeds $60M compared to $56.3M in Q1 2026.
Disproves:Q2 operating income is $60M or lower.
Why it matters: A drop in the land segment shows bigger problems in market conditions.
Confirms:Land segment gross profit declines more than 20% year over year.
Disproves:Land segment gross profit declines less than 20% year over year.
Why it matters: Positive net income shows the company is managing costs well and growing revenue. It indicates financial health.
Confirms:Q2 net income remains positive or improves compared to $26.2M in Q1 2026.
Disproves:Q2 net income falls back into negative territory.