Reading WERN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WERN free→Reading WERN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WERN free→
NASDAQIndustrialsTruckingSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, WERN trades below typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 56% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because recent financials are weak or earnings quality is fragile. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $43.96. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $44 WERN trades at 1× p/s, below its 2× p/s peer median. Our $95 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $29–$47. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 54% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated weak grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=3678).
Over the trailing year it converted -27.56x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, the US dollar.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.21 → $0.22 (+1.1% / 30d). 7 raised, 2 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 13% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 8.5% above current price.
1 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$136.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$363.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,828.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better operating income means lower costs and more profit. This helps long-term success.
Confirms:Operating income is up from last year.
Disproves:Operating income has gone down compared to last year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for WERN yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT. On June 5, 2026 , Werner Receivables Company, LLC (“WRC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Werner Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company"), entered into a third amendment ("Amendment No. 3") to its Loan and Security Agreement, as amended (the "LSA"), as borrower, together with the Company as the servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as a committed lender and group agent, GTA Funding LLC as a conduit lender, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank (“TD Bank”)…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$29.00 – $47.00 (median $40.50) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-06-05
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Cargo Ground Transportation.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WERN Werner Enterprises | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 26 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ODFL Old Dominion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JBHT J.B. Hunt | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | full | moderate |
XPO XPO, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KNX Knight-Swift | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 27 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Werner aims to maintain its capital expenditures within the range of $185M to $225M for the fiscal year 2026.
Werner is committed to enhancing its operating income through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Werner aims to transition from a net loss to positive net income through operational improvements.
Why it matters: More unemployment claims may show a weak economy. This can hurt freight demand and Werner's business.
Confirms:Unemployment claims rise above 300,000 for the week.
Disproves:Unemployment claims fall below 250,000 for the week.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if the company achieved positive net income. This is key for future growth.
Confirms:Q2 earnings report shows positive net income for the quarter.
Disproves:Q2 earnings report shows a net loss for the quarter.
Why it matters: The lawsuit's outcome can affect the company's money and image. Investors want to know the costs.
Confirms:The company announces a settlement or a good ruling in the lawsuit.
Disproves:The company reports a bad ruling or higher legal costs from the lawsuit.
Why it matters: Maintaining CAPEX guidance is crucial for future investments and growth. It shows management's commitment.
Confirms:Management confirms CAPEX guidance remains within the $185M to $225M range.
Disproves:Management cuts CAPEX guidance to less than $185M.
CREATION OF A DIRECT FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR AN OBLIGATION UNDER AN OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENT OF A REGISTRANT. The information set forth in
Director — Carmen A. Tapio: Ms. Tapio retired from the Board of Directors.
and the press release exhibit to this Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section 18, nor shall such information and exhibit be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), unless the registrant expressly states that such information and exhibit are to be c…
and the press release furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section 18, nor shall such information and exhibit deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), unless the registrant expressly states that such information and exhi…