Reading VTRS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VTRS free→Reading VTRS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VTRS free→NASDAQHealth CareDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 39% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $16.48. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $16 VTRS trades at 7× p/e, below its 13× p/e peer median. Our $26 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 38% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 50% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3115).
Over the trailing year it converted -7.31x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=842).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.61 → $0.60 (-1.0% / 30d). 3 raised, 3 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 55% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 33.3% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$122.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$256.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,897.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Confirming plans shows trust in future results. Changes could mean bigger problems.
Confirms one read:Management confirms the 2026 financial plans with no changes.
Confirms the other:Management cuts the financial plans for 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for VTRS yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Financial Officer — Theodora (“Doretta”) Mistras: Ms. Mistras voluntarily ceased to serve as Chief Financial Officer to pursue another professional opportunity.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Pharmaceuticals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
VTRS Viatris | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 52 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
LLY Lilly (Eli) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | expensive | low |
MRK Merck & Co. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
PFE Pfizer | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | fair | low |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Viatris reaffirms its 2026 financial guidance, maintaining revenue and cash flow targets.
Viatris continues its enterprise-wide strategic review to enhance focus and efficiency.
Not yet measured, building a track record across disclosures.
Viatris is advancing its product pipeline with key launches and milestones.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well the company is doing in money and operations.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth above 5% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue growth below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: A slowdown in revenue growth may mean less demand or problems in execution.
Confirms:Q2 2026 total revenues grow less than 3% compared to Q2 2025.
Disproves:Q2 2026 total revenues grow 3% or more compared to Q2 2025.
Why it matters: Meeting or exceeding revenue projections from new products can boost growth outlook.
Confirms:New product revenues reach or exceed the $450 million to $550 million range for 2026.
Disproves:New product revenues fall below the $450 million target for 2026.
Why it matters: This review is crucial for cutting costs and improving efficiency. Delays could hurt financial health.
Confirms:Management says they made good progress on the review. The score is above 50%.
Disproves:No progress reported, keeping the score at 0% or lower.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026 , Viatris Inc. (“Viatris” or the “Company”) issued a press release reporting the Company's financial results for the period ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Item 2.02 (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 26, 2026, Viatris Inc. (“Viatris” or the “Company”) issued a press release reporting the Company's financial results for the period ended December 31, 2025 and announcing 2026 guidance. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Item 2.02 (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange A…
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. In 2025, Viatris initiated an enterprise-wide strategic review (“EWSR”) to enable the Company to build a more focused, efficient and future-ready organization and position the Company for sustained growth beginning in 2026. On February 26, 2026, the Company announced the results of its EWSR, and as a part of the review, committed to and began implementation of certain restructuring activities. These restructuring activities are expected to op…
Other Events. As previously announced, Viatris will host a conference call and live webcast today at 8:30 a.m. ET to review the Company's financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2025. Forward-Looking Statements. This report includes statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” regarding the expected financial performance of Viatris and its strategic and operational plans, including statements regarding Viatris initiated an EWSR to enable the Company to build a more f…