Reading VTOL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VTOL free→Reading VTOL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VTOL free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while the company maintains a capital-friendly stance. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which could impact performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 29% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. If VTOL cuts guidance on the next call, that would be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $43.96. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $44 VTOL trades at 11× p/e, below its 22× p/e peer median. Our $61 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 28% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1255).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.66x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 33% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=789).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.34 → $0.84 (-37.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$96.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$312.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,770.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Confirming revenue guidance shows the company's growth plans are on track. This is key for investor confidence.
Confirms:Management affirms the 2026 revenue guidance during the next earnings call on August 4, 2026.
Disproves:Management revises down the 2026 revenue guidance in the earnings call.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for VTOL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On June 3, 2026, Bristow Group Inc. (the “Company”) held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). At the Annual Meeting, stockholders of the Company approved Amendment No. 4 to the Bristow Group Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amendment”), as described in the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed wi…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Equipment & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
VTOL Bristow Group Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
SLB Schlumberger | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | full | moderate |
BKR Baker Hughes | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
HAL Halliburton | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | fair | moderate |
FTI TechnipFMC | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=329).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management continues to affirm the 2026 revenue guidance range of $1,580M to $1,690M.
Management is committed to maintaining a consistent dividend payout to shareholders.
Focus on enhancing cash flow from operations to support financial stability.
Why it matters: The COO's retirement may change how the company runs. Leadership changes can affect results.
Confirms one read:Announcement of a new COO with relevant experience and a strong track record.
Confirms the other:No announcement of a new COO or delays in the transition process.
Why it matters: Better cash from operations means better financial health. This helps fund growth and dividends.
Confirms:Cash from operations shows a positive trend in the upcoming earnings report.
Disproves:Cash from operations declines or remains stagnant in the next earnings report.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend payout shows financial stability. A cut could worry investors.
Confirms:The company keeps or raises the dividend payout in the Q2 earnings announcement.
Disproves:The company cuts the dividend payout during the Q2 earnings call.
Why it matters: If energy sector revenue growth increases, it could help Bristow's results and future.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth exceeds 8% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well Bristow is managing costs and revenue. This is key for future growth.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth higher than 5% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue growth lower than 0% year over year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 5, 2026, Bristow Group Inc. (“Bristow Group”) issued a press release setting forth its first quarter 2026 financial results. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and hereby incorporated by reference. The information furnished pursuant to Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subj…
Chief Operating Officer, Government Services — Mr. Alan Corbett: Mr. Alan Corbett is retiring from his position with an ongoing search for a successor.