Reading VST? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VST free→Reading VST? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VST free→
NYSEUtilitiesUtilities - Independent Power ProducersSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, although the company has a capital-friendly stance. Peer multiples imply a price about 4% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. The outlook hinges on whether VST cuts guidance on the next call, which could negatively impact estimates. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $148.02. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $148 VST trades at 25× p/e, in line with its 20× p/e peer median. Our $154 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $190–$241. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 4% below a flat-multiple fair value, in line with our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Utilities names rated strong grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=906).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.08x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Utilities names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1075).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.96 → $2.05 (+4.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 8 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 90% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 37.3% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$205.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$497.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,800.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This is a key measure of profit. Results below expectations may signal ongoing challenges.
Confirms:Q2 Adjusted EBITDA is under $300 million. This shows profit problems.
Disproves:Q2 Adjusted EBITDA is over $300 million. This shows better profit results.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for VST yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Vistra Corp. (the “Company”) issued a news release announcing, among other matters, its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of such news release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information set forth in this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$190.00 – $241.00 (median $210.00) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electric Utilities.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
VST Vistra Corp. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | fair | elevated |
SO Southern Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | fair | low |
DUK Duke Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | fair | low |
CEG Constellation Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | full | elevated |
AEP American Electric Power | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | full | low |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Utilities names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLU
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow to strengthen financial performance.
Implement the share buyback program to enhance shareholder value.
Focus on achieving accretion from recent acquisitions to enhance financial performance.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth picks up, it could signal a positive shift for Vistra. This may improve overall market conditions.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth speeds up to about 5% each year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth slows down to less than 3% each year.
Why it matters: Progress on the buyback can signal confidence in the company's financial health.
Confirms:Management says they finished at least $500 million in share buybacks.
Disproves:No updates or delays in the buyback program are reported.
Why it matters: Good acquisitions can help growth and make financial numbers better.
Confirms:Management announces a new acquisition. It is expected to add at least $100 million in EBITDA.
Disproves:No acquisitions are announced. Previous deals may be delayed.
Why it matters: Strong EBITDA growth would show progress in management's goal to increase earnings. It signals better financial health.
Confirms:Q1 Adjusted EBITDA growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q1 Adjusted EBITDA growth is below 0% year over year.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 22, 2026, Vistra Operations Company LLC (“Vistra Operations” or the “Issuer”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Vistra”), completed its previously announced private offering (the “Offering”) of $4.0 billion aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s senior notes, consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Issuer’s 4.550% senior notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information contained in