Reading VG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VG free→Reading VG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track VG free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas MidstreamSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but risk is high and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Earnings quality and management's track record are neutral, and the company's capital stance is capital unfriendly. Peer multiples imply a price about 20% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. If VG reverses and cuts guidance after recently raising, that could lead to a credibility hit, which is a key factor to watch. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $13.08. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $13 VG trades at 14× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $10 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $8.00–$22. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 29% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated strong grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=979).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.19x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 33% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=789).
Most sensitive to the US dollar and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $0.50. 2 raised, 1 cut, 6 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 0 maintained. 55% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 8.0% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$341.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$813.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,873.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
No named catalysts to watch right now. Check back after the next earnings report.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for VG yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 11, 2026, Venture Global LNG, Inc. (“VGLNG”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Venture Global, Inc. (“Venture Global”, “we”, “us” or “our”) completed its previously announced offering (the “Notes Offering”) of (i) $1.125 billion aggregate principal amount of 6.375% senior secured notes due 2034 (the “2034 Notes”) and (ii) $1.125 billion aggregate principal amount of 6.625% senior secured notes due 2036 (the “2036 Notes” and, collectively with th…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$8.00 – $22.00 (median $14.50) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-05-29
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
VG Venture Global Inc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | full | high |
WMB Williams Companies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KMI Kinder Morgan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | moderate |
ET ENERGY TRANSFER LP | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | fair | moderate |
TRGP Targa Resources | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=329).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Tightened and raised the midpoint of the expected cargo range for 2026.
Continued commitment to maintaining a dividend per share of $0.02.
Focus on increasing operating income through improved operational efficiency.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information included in