Reading TXN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TXN free→Reading TXN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TXN free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality and management track record are neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Compared with sector peers, TXN is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 10% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. If TXN cuts guidance on the next call, that could be negative.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $301.12. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $301 TXN trades at 50× p/e, below its 66× p/e peer median. Our $273 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $215–$400. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 10% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.46x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.92 → $1.92 (+0.0% / 30d). 22 raised, 0 cut, 27 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 46% of analysts rate Buy.
4 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 12.4% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$141.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$290.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,956.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will give important details about revenue and EPS. This affects how people feel about the stock.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows strong revenue and EPS growth.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue and EPS decline.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Increase revenue in Q2 2026
Improving end-market trends support revenue growth objectives.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Financial Officer (Chief Accounting Officer) — Rafael Lizardi: Rafael Lizardi is retiring after 25 years, succeeded by Julie Knecht.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$215.00 – $400.00 (median $292.50) · 18 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TXN Texas Instruments | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 8 guided quarters · 10.2% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue for the second quarter of 2026.
Aim to enhance earnings per share for the second quarter of 2026.
Focus on achieving operational synergies post-acquisition.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is key for Texas Instruments. It shows if the company is on track.
Confirms:Q2 2026 revenue growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 2026 revenue growth is below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: Earnings per share is important for showing profit growth. It affects investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 2026 EPS exceeds $2.00.
Disproves:Q2 2026 EPS is below $1.50.
Why it matters: A new CFO can change financial strategy. This may affect investor confidence and stock performance.
Confirms one read:Positive market reaction to the new CFO's first public statements or strategy.
Confirms the other:Negative market reaction or lack of confidence in the new CFO's strategy.
Why it matters: Cost savings can lower expenses and raise profits. This helps overall earnings.
Confirms one read:Management says they reached at least 75% of their cost savings goals.
Confirms the other:Management says they reached less than 50% of their cost savings goals.
Why it matters: Getting operational synergies can cut costs and improve margins. This is important for growth.
Confirms:Management says there are at least 10% savings from working together better.
Disproves:No progress on working together better was reported in Q2 2026.
Advances: Increase revenue in Q2 2026
Improving end-market trends support revenue growth objectives.
New product aligns with growth objectives in key sectors.
New product aligns with growth objectives in key sectors.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition The Registrant’s news release dated April 22, 2026, regarding its first-quarter results of operations and financial condition is attached hereto as Exhibit 99. The attached news release includes references to the following financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (non-GAAP measures): free cash flow and ratios based on free cash flow. The company believes these non-GA…
Senior Vice President — Hagop Kozanian: Senior Vice President Hagop Kozanian is retiring effective August 31, 2026.
Other Events On February 4, 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated (“Texas Instruments”) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (“Silicon Labs”) issued a joint press release announcing the entry into a definitive agreement under which Texas Instruments will acquire Silicon Labs. The press release also announced that Texas Instruments will hold a webcast to discuss the transaction and answer questions. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein.…