Reading TT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TT free→Reading TT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TT free→
NYSEIndustrialsBuilding Products & EquipmentSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, TT is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 92% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. Rich on today's multiple, the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $458.25. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $458 the market pays 35× p/e — above the 18× p/e peer median but in line with its own 33× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $239 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $475–$585. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 92% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality.
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.20x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $4.29 → $4.26 (-0.8% / 30d). 3 raised, 17 cut, 21 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 54% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 16.8% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$113.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$280.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,997.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This growth rate is key to meeting the full-year target of 9.5%.
Confirms:Q2 organic revenue growth was below 7%.
Disproves:Q2 organic revenue growth reported at or above 7%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On June 4, 2026, the Board of Directors of Trane Technologies plc (the “Company”) appointed Donald E. Simmons, age 55, as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective as of July 1 2026 (the “Effective Date”). Mr. Simmons has served as Group President, Americas since January 2024. He previously served as Americas Seg…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$475.00 – $585.00 (median $550.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Building Products.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JCI Johnson Controls | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | low |
CARR Carrier Global | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LII Lennox International | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | full | moderate |
MAS Masco | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | moderate |
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
The company aims for a 9.5% increase in reported revenue for the full year 2026.
The company aims for GAAP and adjusted EPS between $14.75 and $14.95 for the full year 2026.
The company focuses on effective capital allocation to support growth and operational efficiency.
Why it matters: Earnings per share is critical for achieving the full-year EPS target.
Confirms:Q2 GAAP or adjusted EPS reported below $14.75.
Disproves:Q2 GAAP or adjusted EPS reported at or above $14.75.
Why it matters: Changes in capital plans can affect financial health. They can also influence growth.
Confirms one read:A new capital plan was announced. It will greatly lower debt.
Confirms the other:A capital plan was announced that increases debt levels.
Why it matters: An update on EPS shows management's trust in reaching financial goals.
Confirms one read:Management raises EPS guidance to $14.75 or higher.
Confirms the other:Management cuts EPS guidance to below $14.75.
Why it matters: Backlog growth shows future revenue and demand strength.
Confirms:Backlog growth was below 30% year-over-year.
Disproves:Backlog growth was at or above 30% year-over-year.
Why it matters: Achieving this growth target is key for Trane's 2026 goals. It shows strong demand and execution.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth of 9.5% or higher year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth below 5% year over year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 30, 2026 , Trane Technologies plc issued a press release announcing its first quarter 2026 results. The information in this Form 8-K and the exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, e…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 23, 2026, Trane Technologies Holdco Inc. (“TTH”) and Trane Technologies Financing Limited (“TTFL” and, together with TTH, the “Borrowers”), Trane Technologies plc (“TT Parent”), Trane Technologies Lux International Holding Company S.à r.l. (“TT Lux Holding Company”), Trane Technologies Irish Holdings Unlimited Company (“Irish Holdings”), Trane Technologies Americas Holding Corporation (“TTAHC”), Trane Technologies Global Holding II Company…
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. Effective April 23, 2026, the Borrowers and the Guarantors terminated the 2022 Revolving Credit Agreement.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information in