Reading TRMK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TRMK free→Reading TRMK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TRMK free→
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well supported by cash. Risk is low, but the sector backdrop presents a headwind, which may affect performance compared to peers, where TRMK is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 6% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening, as recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. Key factors to watch include the potential impact of interest rate changes and the performance of sector bellwethers like HDB, IBN, and PNC. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $45.91. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $46 TRMK trades at 12× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $43 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 6% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.83x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated fragile grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.95 → $0.96 (+0.7% / 30d). 4 raised, 1 cut, 6 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 17% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$80.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$188.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,067.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation changed, rising to a full label. The earnings quality remained fragile, indicating ongoing concerns in that area. The macro backdrop is currently unfavorable, with headwinds present in the sector backdrop.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The sector is currently growing. If Trustmark's revenue growth drops, it may signal trouble ahead.
Confirms:Trustmark's revenue growth falls below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth stays above 10% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TRMK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 28, 2026, Trustmark Corporation issued a press release announcing its financial results for the period ended March 31, 2026. A copy of this press release and the accompanying financial statements and slide presentation are attached hereto as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Regional Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TRMK Trustmark Corp. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | fair | low |
HDB HDFC BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
IBN ICICI BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
ITUB ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING SA | — | — | moderate |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 2 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Maintain noninterest expense at stable levels to support profitability.
Continue to grow loans and deposits to enhance financial performance.
Implement a stock repurchase program to enhance shareholder value.
Why it matters: Inflation data impacts interest rates. This can change how Trustmark lends money.
Confirms one read:CPI shows a decrease. This means inflation is easing.
Confirms the other:CPI shows an increase. This means inflation is rising.
Why it matters: The earnings results will show how Trustmark is performing amid mixed signals. This is key for understanding its financial health.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share (EPS) exceeds $0.75, indicating strong performance.
Confirms the other:EPS is below $0.50. This means weaker performance.
Why it matters: Unemployment claims impact consumer spending. Higher claims may hurt Trustmark's loan performance.
Confirms:Weekly unemployment claims go up a lot. This shows economic stress.
Disproves:Weekly unemployment claims are falling. This shows the economy is stable.