Reading TPR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TPR free→Reading TPR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TPR free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryLuxury GoodsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but the capital stance is capital unfriendly. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate, while TPR trades above typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 16% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $147.42. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $147 TPR trades at 22× p/e, in line with its 18× p/e peer median. Our $125 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $142–$187. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 18% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 48% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=3804).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.87x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated robust grew net income 65% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.25 → $1.25 (-0.1% / 30d). 16 raised, 0 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 71% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 29.2% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$155.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$326.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,920.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is key to reaching the $7.75 billion target for FY 2026. If growth slows, it raises concerns about overall performance.
Confirms:Q3 revenue was below $1.9 billion. This shows slower growth.
Disproves:Q3 revenue was above $1.9 billion. This shows growth momentum.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TPR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Tapestry, Inc. (“Tapestry” or the “Company”) issued a press release (the “Press Release”) in which the Company announced its financial results for its third fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2026. The Company also posted a slide presentation entitled “Investor Presentation” dated May 7, 2026 on the “Presentations & Financial Reports” investor section of its website ( www.tapestry.com ). A copy of the Press Release is furnished herewi…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$142.00 – $187.00 (median $175.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-06-02
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | full | moderate |
NKE Nike, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | moderate |
LULU Lululemon Athletica | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | full | moderate |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=646).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Tapestry aims to achieve revenue growth of approximately 14% in FY 2026, exceeding previous guidance.
Tapestry targets EPS growth exceeding 35% for FY 2026, surpassing previous guidance.
Tapestry plans to return $1.6 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in FY 2026.
Why it matters: Meeting this growth target shows strong demand and good strategy execution.
Confirms:Q3 revenue growth reported above 25% year over year.
Disproves:Q3 revenue growth reported below 25% year over year.
Why it matters: If consumer spending slows, it could mean a bigger slowdown for Tapestry.
Confirms:Consumer spending growth was below its average.
Disproves:Consumer spending growth is above its average.
Why it matters: More buybacks show strong cash flow and a promise to give value to shareholders.
Confirms:Share repurchases were over $1.3 billion in FY 2026.
Disproves:Share repurchases were below $1.3 billion in FY 2026.
Why it matters: Missing this target may show profit problems and hurt investor trust.
Confirms:EPS growth reported below 35% year over year.
Disproves:EPS growth reported at or above 35% year over year.
Why it matters: Plans to return $1.5 billion to shareholders signal confidence in cash flow and growth. Lack of clarity may raise concerns.
Confirms:Clear announcement of the $1.5 billion return plan in Q3 earnings.
Disproves:No mention of the shareholder return plan in Q3 earnings.
Director — Matthew Madrigal: The company appointed a new director.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 5, 2026, Tapestry, Inc. (“Tapestry” or the “Company”) issued a press release (the “Press Release”) in which the Company announced its financial results for its second fiscal quarter ended December 27, 2025. The Company also posted a slide presentation entitled “Investor Presentation” dated February 5, 2026 on the “Presentations & Financial Reports” investor section of its website ( www.tapestry.com ). A copy of the Press Release is fu…
Director — John P. (JP) Bilbrey: Mr. Bilbrey will not stand for re-election to the Board.
CEO — Joanne Crevoiserat: A special equity grant was awarded to the CEO for talent retention and succession planning.