Reading TMUS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TMUS free→Reading TMUS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TMUS free→
NASDAQCommunication ServicesTelecom ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 19% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. If TMUS reverses and cuts guidance after recently raising, that could lead to a credibility hit. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $189.10. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $189 TMUS trades at 20× p/e, in line with its 19× p/e peer median. Our $174 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $220–$285. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 8% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=701).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.69x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=690).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
17 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Communication Services names rated volatile grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=200).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.65 → $2.59 (-2.3% / 30d). 4 raised, 11 cut, 17 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 86% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$111.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$257.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,075.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Falling below this number could mean fewer new customers. This may hurt future revenues.
Confirms:Postpaid net account additions reported below 950,000 for Q2.
Disproves:Postpaid net account additions exceed 1,050,000 for Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TMUS yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
to this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 , is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$220.00 – $285.00 (median $253.50) · 12 analysts · as of 2026-04-30
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Communication Services (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | full | moderate |
GOOG Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
META Meta Platforms | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
NFLX Netflix | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Expand the shareholder return program to up to $18.2 billion by year-end 2026.
Focus on increasing service revenues, particularly in postpaid services.
Maintain capital expenditures at approximately $10 billion for 2026.
Why it matters: The buyback shows T-Mobile's commitment to returning cash to shareholders. It can boost share prices if executed well.
Confirms:T-Mobile announces completion of at least $1 billion in share buybacks by the end of Q2 2026.
Disproves:No significant buybacks reported by the end of Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Changes in capital spending can impact growth and cash flow. Investors watch this closely.
Confirms one read:Management plans to spend over $10 billion in 2026.
Confirms the other:Management plans to spend less than $8 billion in 2026.
Why it matters: Lower growth may show problems in operations and affect investor trust.
Confirms:Core Adjusted EBITDA growth reported below 12% for Q2.
Disproves:Core Adjusted EBITDA growth exceeds 13% for Q2.
Why it matters: Slower growth may show problems with pricing and getting new customers.
Confirms:Service revenue growth reported below 11% for Q2.
Disproves:Service revenue growth exceeds 12% for Q2.
Why it matters: More buybacks or dividends would show good use of money and trust in cash flow.
Confirms:Watch for news about buybacks or dividends from the $18.2 billion return program.
Disproves:No big buybacks or dividends were announced, even with the bigger return program.
Other Events. On April 23, 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), announced that its Board of Directors (the “Board”) has authorized an increase to the Company’s shareholder return program (the “2026 Shareholder Return Program”) of up to $3.6 billion, reflecting an increase from up to $14.6 billion of shareholder returns to up to $18.2 billion. As previously announced, the 2026 Shareholder Return Program will run through December 31, 2026. Utilization of the authoriz…
Other Events. On March 31, 2026, following the previous repayment of certain legacy indebtedness, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“ TMUSA ”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“ TMUS ”), elected to release the guarantees of certain subsidiaries under its $10 billion revolving credit agreement pursuant to the terms thereof, resulting in a corresponding release under the indentures dated April 28, 2013, April 9, 2020 and September 15, 2022, governing its outstanding senior notes. As a result,…
Director — Abdurazak Mudesir: Mr. Mudesir resigned from the Board and a committee, effective March 31, 2026.
to this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 , is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.