Reading TEL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TEL free→Reading TEL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TEL free→NYSEInformation TechnologyElectronic ComponentsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a tailwind, helping the company. Peer multiples imply a price about 38% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. If TEL cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $210.38. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $210 TEL trades at 21× p/e, below its 31× p/e peer median. Our $347 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $226–$286. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 39% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.52x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.84 → $2.84 (-0.0% / 30d). 12 raised, 0 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 68% of analysts rate Buy.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 43.8% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$171.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$349.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,113.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: GDP growth impacts overall market conditions. Strong GDP growth can boost TE Connectivity's sales outlook.
Confirms one read:GDP growth reported at 2% or higher for Q1 2026.
Confirms the other:GDP growth reported below 1% for Q1 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TEL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 22, 2026, TE Connectivity plc (the “Company”) issued a press release reporting the Company’s second quarter results for fiscal 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and incorporated by reference in this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$226.00 – $286.00 (median $270.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-04-23
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Manufacturing Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TEL TE Connectivity | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
FLEX Flex Ltd. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | elevated |
JBL Jabil | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | fair | moderate |
FN Fabrinet | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
TTMI TTM Technologies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on maintaining orders momentum to achieve double-digit sales growth.
Target a 17% year-over-year increase in adjusted EPS for the upcoming quarter.
Continue to drive orders momentum across all business segments.
Why it matters: Sales growth below 10% would signal weakening demand and challenge growth targets.
Confirms:Q3 sales reported at less than $5 billion, indicating growth below 10%.
Disproves:Q3 sales reported at $5 billion or higher, confirming strong demand.
Why it matters: Raising adjusted EPS by 17% is important. It shows better profits and efficiency.
Confirms:Adjusted EPS reported at $1.50 or higher for Q2.
Disproves:Adjusted EPS reported below $1.25 for Q2.
Why it matters: If adjusted EPS growth is below 17%, it may show problems. This could hurt investor trust.
Confirms:Adjusted EPS is below $2.83. This means growth is less than 17%.
Disproves:Adjusted EPS is $2.83 or more. This shows strong operational performance.
Why it matters: A slowdown in orders may show weaker demand in different areas.
Confirms:Orders growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Orders growth reported at 10% or higher, confirming strong demand.
Why it matters: Achieving double-digit sales growth is a key goal for TE Connectivity. It shows strong demand and market position.
Confirms:Q2 sales growth reported at 10% or higher year over year.
Disproves:Q2 sales growth reported below 5% year over year.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On February 13, 2026, TE Connectivity plc (the “Company”) entered into a Five-Year Senior Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), by and among the Company, as parent guarantor, its wholly-owned subsidiary TE Connectivity Switzerland Ltd. (the “Intermediate Guarantor”), as intermediate guarantor, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Tyco Electronics Group S.A. (“TEGSA”), as borrower, the lenders party thereto (the “Lenders”) and Bank of America, N.A., as a…
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement The information contained in
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant The information contained in
OTHER EVENTS. On February 9, 2026, Tyco Electronics Group S.A. (“TEGSA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TE Connectivity plc (“TE Connectivity”), issued $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 4.500% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “Additional 2031 Notes”) and $550,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 4.875% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2036 Notes” and, together with the Additional 2031 Notes, the “Notes”). The Additional 2031 Notes will constitute a further issuance of, form a single ser…