Reading SWK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SWK free→Reading SWK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SWK free→NYSEIndustrialsTools & AccessoriesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been neutral, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance compared to sector peers, where SWK is trading at a typical level. Peer multiples imply a price about 33% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $83.62. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $84 SWK trades at 18× p/e, below its 24× p/e peer median. Our $125 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $82–$87. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 33% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.70x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, the US dollar, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.28 → $1.20 (-6.2% / 30d). 1 raised, 13 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 33% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 5.3% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$154.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$321.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,613.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'mixed' to 'mild_favorable'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If EPS guidance is confirmed, it shows confidence in financial results after the CAM sale.
Confirms:Management confirms GAAP EPS guidance in the range of $4.15 to $5.35.
Disproves:Management lowers or withdraws EPS guidance for 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for SWK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 29, 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. issued a press release announcing first quarter 2026 results.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$82.00 – $87.00 (median $84.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-28
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
PH Parker Hannifin | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
ITW Illinois Tool Works | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | fair | moderate |
GWW W. W. Grainger | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
DOV Dover Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | fair | low |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing free cash flow to meet or exceed guidance targets.
Aim to enhance earnings per share through operational efficiencies and strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if the company improves free cash flow and EPS. Investors look for signs of recovery.
Confirms:Q2 earnings report shows free cash flow improvement and EPS growth over the previous quarter.
Disproves:Q2 earnings report shows free cash flow decline and EPS drop compared to the previous quarter.
Why it matters: Retail sales trends will show if the company can recover from recent drops in volume.
Confirms one read:North America retail sales show growth of at least 2% year over year.
Confirms the other:North America retail sales are falling more each year.
Why it matters: Improving free cash flow signals better cash management and supports growth plans.
Confirms:Free cash flow reported above $700 million for Q2 2026.
Disproves:Free cash flow reported below $500 million for Q2 2026.
Why it matters: A rebound in sector growth could benefit Stanley Black & Decker. It indicates a healthier market.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth is speeding up again, nearing 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Better EPS is key for the company's growth. It shows how well the company is doing.
Confirms:EPS increases by more than 5% compared to Q1 2026.
Disproves:EPS decreases or remains flat compared to Q1 2026.
Shareholders approved changes to the company's equity plan.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 4, 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. issued a press release announcing fourth quarter and full year 2025 results.
Director — Andrea Ayers: Andrea Ayers is retiring from the Board, and Shane O'Kelly was elected as a new director.
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary — Janet M. Link: Janet M. Link is leaving to pursue a professional opportunity outside the company.