Reading STE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track STE free→Reading STE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track STE free→NYSEHealth CareMedical DevicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate, while the company is above typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 7% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and sector trends from major players like ABT, SYK, and MDT. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $207.56. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $208 STE trades at 20× p/e, below its 23× p/e peer median. Our $236 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 12% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.71x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.49 → $2.50 (+0.4% / 30d). 2 raised, 2 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 75% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 24.9% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$93.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$238.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,467.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This would indicate STERIS is not on track to meet its growth target for fiscal 2026.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 8% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth stays at or above 8% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for STE yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Furthermore, the information contained in this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
STE Steris | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | fair | moderate |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SYK Stryker Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MDT Medtronic | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=842).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to increase revenue by 7-8% for fiscal year 2027.
Management targets achieving $850 million in free cash flow for fiscal year 2027.
Management plans to maintain capital expenditures at approximately $375 million.
Focus on achieving an 8-9% increase in revenue for fiscal year 2026.
Why it matters: Hitting this target shows STERIS is managing its cash well and supports growth plans.
Confirms:Free cash flow reported at or above $850M.
Disproves:Free cash flow reported below $850M.
Why it matters: Achieving this target shows Steris is on track with its growth plans. It signals strong demand and effective operations.
Confirms:Q4 revenue growth reaches 8% or more year over year.
Disproves:Q4 revenue growth falls below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Spending more than this amount may show financial problems or poor resource use.
Confirms:Capital spending is over $375M.
Disproves:Capital spending is at or below $375M.
Why it matters: Changes in leadership can change company plans and affect investor trust. It is important to watch this.
Confirms one read:New leaders say positive things about future plans and growth.
Confirms the other:Stakeholders have negative views or doubts about the leadership change.
Why it matters: This could indicate a broader slowdown in the healthcare sector affecting STERIS.
Confirms:Healthcare sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Healthcare sector revenue growth remains at or above its median.
Why it matters: Leadership changes can impact strategy and performance. Clarity on the new CEO's vision is crucial.
Confirms one read:The new CEO outlines a clear strategy and goals within the next quarter.
Confirms the other:There is still uncertainty about the new CEO's plans.
Why it matters: Achieving this growth target shows Steris is on track. It reflects strong demand and effective strategies.
Confirms:Revenue growth reaches 8-9% year over year in fiscal 2026.
Disproves:Revenue growth falls below 8% year over year in fiscal 2026.
Director — Richard C. Breeden: Mr. Breeden retired from the Board, and Pierre Boulud was appointed as a new Director.
senior financial advisor — Michael J. Tokich: Mr. Tokich's employment was extended on a part-time basis with changes to his compensation and benefits.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Furthermore, the information contained in this
Director — Dr. Richard Steeves: Dr. Richard Steeves is retiring from the Board of Directors after 10 years of service.