Reading SNDK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SNDK free→Reading SNDK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SNDK free→NASDAQInformation TechnologyComputer HardwareSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 204% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. The valuation is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $1980.10. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $1,980 the market pays 64× p/e — above the 22× p/e peer median but in line with its own 54× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $650 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $975–$2,900. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 205% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.76x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $33.05 → $33.72 (+2.0% / 30d). 12 raised, 0 cut, 16 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 7 maintained. 78% of analysts rate Buy.
6 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 43.5% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 200.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$455.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$715.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,134.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation rose by 14.2 points (from 23.1 to 37.3).
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This guidance shows profit expectations. Meeting this range can mean good cost control and strong sales.
Confirms:Q4 EPS reported within or above the guidance range of $30.00 to $33.00.
Disproves:Q4 EPS reported below $30.00.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for SNDK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 30, 2026 , Sandisk Corporation (the “Company”) announced financial results for the fiscal third quarter ended April 3, 2026. A copy of the press release making this announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Secu…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$975.00 – $2900.00 (median $1400.00) · 22 analysts · as of 2026-06-08
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SNDK Sandisk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
AAPL Apple Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
DELL Dell Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | elevated |
STX Seagate Technology | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
WDC Western Digital | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on transitioning to higher-value end markets, particularly in Datacenter.
Advance to a new business model built on multi-year customer engagements.
Initiate a $6 billion share repurchase program to enhance shareholder value.
Forecast Q4 revenue to be in the range of $7.75 billion to $8.25 billion.
Forecast Q4 EPS to be in the range of $30.00 to $33.00.
Why it matters: This range shows if Sandisk can keep its strong growth trend. It reflects demand and pricing power.
Confirms:Q4 revenue reported within the guidance range of $7.75 billion to $8.25 billion.
Disproves:Q4 revenue falls below $7.75 billion.
Why it matters: More agreements would show progress in shifting to higher-value markets. This is key for growth.
Confirms:Announcement of two or more New Business Model agreements signed in Q4.
Disproves:No new agreements announced in Q4.
Why it matters: This program could boost investor confidence and support the stock price. It shows management's commitment to returning value to shareholders.
Confirms:An official announcement confirms the start of the $6 billion share buyback program.
Disproves:No announcement or a delay in the share repurchase program.
Other Events. On April 30, 2026 , the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a $6 billion (exclusive of fees and commissions) share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”). The acquisition of shares under the Repurchase Program may be effected from time to time through open market purchases (including under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or other methods of acquiring shares, in each case on such terms and…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 25, 2026, Sandisk Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sandisk Corporation, entered into a Private Placement Subscription Agreement (the “Equity Investment Agreement”) with Nanya Technology Corporation (“Nanya”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to make a strategic equity investment in Nanya through a private placement of Nanya common stock (the “Transaction”). Under the Equity Investment Agreement, the Compa…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On January 29, 2026 , Sandisk Corporation (the “Company”) announced financial results for the fiscal second quarter ended January 2, 2026. A copy of the press release making this announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the…
Director — Alexander Bradley: Appointment of Alexander Bradley as a new director.