Reading SMCI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SMCI free→Reading SMCI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SMCI free→NASDAQInformation TechnologyComputer HardwareSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is fragile. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive changes. Risk is high, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 58% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern suggests potential issues due to weak financials or fragile earnings quality. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $30.46. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $30 SMCI trades at 13× p/e, below its 22× p/e peer median. Our $69 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $30–$45. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 56% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 59%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted -5.37x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.71 → $0.71 (-0.1% / 30d). 14 raised, 0 cut, 17 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 26% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -4.5% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 67% of the last 3 guided quarters · 12.8% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$317.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$728.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,618.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Company momentum fell by 25.3 points (from 50.7 to 25.4).
Valuation fell by 19.0 points (from 70.0 to 51.0).
Composite insight fell by 10.2 points (from 23.0 to 12.8).
Confidence changed from 'medium' to 'high'.
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This guidance will show if Supermicro can maintain its growth momentum. It is key for investor confidence.
Confirms:Q4 revenue guidance is at least $11.0 billion.
Disproves:Q4 revenue guidance falls below $11.0 billion.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for SMCI yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Distribution Agreement On June 11, 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) entered into a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as agents (each, an “Agent” and collectively, the “Agents”), to sell shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) having aggregate sales proce…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$30.00 – $45.00 (median $40.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-06-01
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SMCI Supermicro | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
AAPL Apple Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SNDK Sandisk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
DELL Dell Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | elevated |
STX Seagate Technology | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Supermicro aims to achieve $40 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2026.
Supermicro is focused on expanding its order book, particularly with Blackwell Ultra products.
Supermicro aims to maintain positive EPS guidance for upcoming quarters.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Why it matters: Revenue growth is key to reaching the $40 billion target for FY 2026. A drop below 10% signals trouble.
Confirms:Q1 FY 2026 revenue growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q1 FY 2026 revenue growth reported above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: Expanding the order book is vital for future revenue growth. It signals demand for new products.
Confirms:New orders for Blackwell Ultra are higher than expected.
Disproves:New orders for Blackwell Ultra fall short of expectations.
Why it matters: Cash flow is critical for funding growth. A stable cash flow shows financial health.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations improves from $6.6 billion in Q3.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations declines from $6.6 billion in Q3.
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1, are being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, unless otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales — Mr. Don Clegg: Mr. Don Clegg retired and will continue as a consultant.
Senior Vice President of Business Development, Board Member — Yih-Shyan 'Wally' Liaw: Resigned and placed on administrative leave due to indictment for alleged export-control violations.
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1, are being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, unless otherwise expressly stated in such filing.