Reading SF? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SF free→Reading SF? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SF free→
NYSEFinancialsCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and management's recent track record has been steady. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 29% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. The outlook hinges on guidance changes from SF and sector bellwethers like MS, GS, and SCHW. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $72.66. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $73 SF trades at 13× p/e, below its 18× p/e peer median. Our $98 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 26% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.17x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.36 → $1.39 (+1.9% / 30d). 0 raised, 5 cut, 8 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 38% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 0.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$89.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$267.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,159.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'inexpensive' to 'fair'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in earnings growth would signal a slowdown in the financial sector's growth phase.
Confirms:Q2 earnings growth reported below 12% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 earnings growth reported at or above 12% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Threatens: Increase revenue by 30%-40% vs 2025-Q1
Loss of talent could hinder revenue growth objectives.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. As described in more detail below under Item 5.07, on June 9, 2026, the shareholders of Stifel Financial Corp. (the “Company”) approved amendments to the Stifel Financial Corp. 2001 Incentive Stock Plan (2018 Restatement) (the “Plan”). The material terms of the Plan are summarized in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed w…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SF Stifel | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MS Morgan Stanley | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
GS Goldman Sachs | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | full | moderate |
SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | fair | moderate |
IBKR Interactive Brokers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Aim to increase revenue by 30%-40% compared to the first quarter of 2025.
Target an earnings per share of $1.45 for the first quarter of 2026.
Continue to maintain the dividend per share at a consistent level.
Why it matters: Achieving this revenue growth shows strong business momentum and supports long-term goals.
Confirms:Revenue growth for Q1 2026 is reported at 30% or more compared to Q1 2025.
Disproves:Revenue growth is reported below 30% compared to Q1 2025.
Why it matters: If growth drops below the median, it may mean trouble for the financial sector. This could hurt Stifel's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth is reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: More unemployment claims may show a weak economy. This could hurt Stifel's business.
Confirms:Unemployment claims reported above the previous week's level by more than 10%.
Disproves:Unemployment claims have stayed the same or gone down each week.
Why it matters: The FOMC's choice may change interest rates. This affects Stifel's lending and investments.
Confirms one read:FOMC raises rates or signals a hawkish stance.
Confirms the other:FOMC maintains rates or signals a dovish stance.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend shows good finances. It also shows care for shareholders.
Confirms:The company declares a dividend per share that is equal to or higher than the previous quarter.
Disproves:The company cuts the dividend per share from the previous quarter.
Why it matters: Hitting this EPS target shows the company is on track with its growth goals. It is a key measure of performance.
Confirms:The company reports Q1 2026 EPS of $1.45 or higher.
Disproves:Q1 2026 EPS falls below $1.45.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 22, 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. (the “Company”) reported its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release containing this information is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Report on Form 8-K. In addition, a copy of the Company’s Financial Supplement for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, is attached as Exhibit 99.2 to this Report on Form 8-K. On Wednesday, April 22, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time, th…