Reading SCHW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SCHW free→Reading SCHW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SCHW free→NYSEFinancialsCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair. If SCHW cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $91.10. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $91 SCHW trades at 17× p/e, below its 18× p/e peer median. Our $89 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $108–$137. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 2% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 17.78x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.47 → $1.51 (+2.8% / 30d). 9 raised, 0 cut, 17 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 4 maintained. 86% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 42.9% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 50% of the last 2 guided quarters · -22.8% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$94.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$242.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,012.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'fair' to 'full'.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation changed and rose to a label of "full." The sector backdrop fell, indicating a headwind for the company. The risk dimension remained moderate, while earnings quality was described as robust. The management dimension was neutral, reflecting no significant change in that area.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in net new assets could signal weakening client engagement and growth momentum.
Confirms:Q2 core net new assets reported below $140 billion.
Disproves:Q2 core net new assets reported above $140 billion.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Threatens: Maintain strong revenue momentum
Fee cuts may impact revenue momentum negatively.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Other Events On May 21, 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation (“CSC”) issued $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.744% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2030 and $1,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.493% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2037 (collectively, the “Notes”). The net proceeds of the offering of the Notes were approximately $2,236 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. The Notes were issued unde…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$108.00 – $137.00 (median $127.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-05-15
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | full | moderate |
MS Morgan Stanley | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
GS Goldman Sachs | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | full | moderate |
IBKR Interactive Brokers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
HOOD Robinhood Markets | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | expensive | high |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving record GAAP Earnings Per Share as a key growth metric.
Continue to drive revenue growth through business momentum and favorable market conditions.
Focus on effective capital allocation through debt issuance and other financial strategies.
Why it matters: The sector is easing, and revenue growth is a key indicator of performance. A drop could signal further challenges.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported below 12% in the next earnings release.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains above 12%, showing strong momentum.
Why it matters: A drop in GAAP EPS may show weaker profits and hurt investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 GAAP EPS reported below $1.37.
Disproves:Q2 GAAP EPS reported above $1.37.
Why it matters: Updates on capital use will show how Schwab plans to spend the new funds.
Confirms one read:Management shares a clear plan for capital use after the debt issuance.
Confirms the other:No updates or unclear statements on capital use after the debt issuance.
Why it matters: Slower growth in trading revenue may mean fewer clients are active and engaged.
Confirms:Q2 trading revenue growth was below 20% compared to last year.
Disproves:Q2 trading revenue growth was above 20% compared to last year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 16, 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders In connection with the Preferred Issuance, CSC filed a Certificate of Designations (the “Certificate of Designations”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing the voting rights, powers, preferences and privileges, and the relative, participating, optional or other rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of the Series L Preferred Stock on April 22, 2026. Holders of the Depositary Shares…