Reading SANM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SANM free→Reading SANM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SANM free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologyElectronic ComponentsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind, supporting the company's position compared with sector peers, which is typical. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment hinges on guidance changes, as a cut could negatively impact expectations, while a raise could provide a momentum boost. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $255.20. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $255 SANM trades at 29× p/e, in line with its 28× p/e peer median. Our $253 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 1% near-term growth, below our forecast of about 31%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.76x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.79 → $2.79 (+0.0% / 30d). 2 raised, 0 cut, 4 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 25% of analysts rate Buy.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$215.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$579.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,269.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Lower revenue guidance shows weaker demand. This could hurt investor confidence.
Confirms:Q3 revenue guidance below $3.2 billion.
Disproves:Q3 revenue guidance of $3.5 billion or higher.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for SANM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION On April 27, 2026, Sanmina Corporation (the “Company”) issued the press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 announcing unaudited financial results for its fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2026. The information set forth in this Item 2.02, including the exhibit hereto, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. In…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Manufacturing Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SANM Sanmina Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | fair | elevated |
TEL TE Connectivity | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
FLEX Flex Ltd. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | elevated |
JBL Jabil | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | fair | moderate |
FN Fabrinet | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Improve operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Enhance cash flow from operations to support growth and investment.
Why it matters: Strong revenue growth would confirm that management's priority to increase revenue is on track.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 90% year over year, showing strong demand.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth is below 80% compared to last year. This shows weaker performance.
Why it matters: More cash from operations helps growth and investment. It shows progress on management's goals.
Confirms:Cash from operations exceeds $400M in Q2.
Disproves:Cash from operations falls below $350M in Q2.
Why it matters: A drop below median growth in the sector may show bigger problems for Sanmina.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth drops below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: A big rise in operating income shows good cost management. It also matches management's goals.
Confirms:Operating income increases by at least 20% in Q2 compared to Q1.
Disproves:Operating income does not go up or goes down compared to Q1.
Why it matters: More buybacks show strong confidence in the company's financial health.
Confirms:Share repurchases are over $600 million.
Disproves:Share repurchases are below $300 million.
Why it matters: Lower cash flow raises worries about financial health and how well the company runs.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations below $399 million.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations above $450 million.