Reading ROK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ROK free→Reading ROK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ROK free→
NYSEIndustrialsSpecialty Industrial MachinerySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind, while ROK trades above typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 17% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. This assessment hinges on guidance changes and sector trends, particularly the performance of key industrial bellwethers. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $459.34. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $459 ROK trades at 38× p/e, in line with its 32× p/e peer median. Our $392 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $445–$525. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 17% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 19%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.41x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.09 → $3.37 (+9.1% / 30d). 20 raised, 0 cut, 22 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 48% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 8.8% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$124.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$258.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,872.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Higher EPS guidance would signal stronger earnings growth and confidence in the business.
Confirms:Management increased EPS guidance for fiscal 2026. This is higher than what people expect.
Disproves:EPS guidance remains unchanged or is lowered.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Increase EPS guidance for fiscal 2026
Major target hike indicates improved growth expectations.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Registrant's press release dated May 5, 2026, announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$445.00 – $525.00 (median $501.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electrical Components & Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ROK Rockwell Automation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 99 of 100 | full | moderate |
ETN Eaton Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
VRT Vertiv | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
EMR Emerson Electric | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 61 of 100 | fair | moderate |
BE Bloom Energy Corp. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | expensive | high |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to increase the EPS guidance for fiscal 2026.
Management is committed to maintaining a steady growth in dividends.
Management aims to achieve consistent revenue growth.
Why it matters: Earnings results will provide insights into financial health and growth prospects.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows a big beat on revenue and EPS.
Confirms the other:Earnings report misses on revenue and EPS.
Why it matters: Faster revenue growth shows a good change in the business cycle.
Confirms:Revenue growth speeds up to over 6% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth slows down to below 6% year over year.
Director — David A. Zapico: Election of a new director to the board.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Registrant's press release dated February 5, 2026, announcing its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Shareowners approved a new long-term incentives plan.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. The information set forth under “