Reading QCOM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track QCOM free→Reading QCOM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track QCOM free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a tailwind, helping the company. Peer multiples imply a price about 64% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers like NVDA and TSM, which could impact QCOM's momentum.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $211.72. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $212 QCOM trades at 18× p/e, below its 66× p/e peer median. Our $584 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $120–$300. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 64% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.44x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.22 → $2.23 (+0.4% / 30d). 1 raised, 24 cut, 31 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 30% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.2% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$144.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$435.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,312.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Stable or better EPS guidance would show confidence in Qualcomm's earnings during tough times.
Confirms:Qualcomm maintains or raises its EPS guidance for Q3 to at least $2.10.
Disproves:Qualcomm lowers its EPS guidance for Q3 below $2.10.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
New partnership enhances growth potential and valuation outlook.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 29, 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated (the Company) issued a press release regarding the Company’s financial results for its second quarter of fiscal 2026. A copy of that press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The press release includes Non-GAAP financial measures as defined in Regulation G. The press release also includes the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$120.00 – $300.00 (median $172.50) · 18 analysts · as of 2026-06-12
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
QCOM Qualcomm | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 6 guided quarters · 6.3% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on resolving memory supply constraints impacting demand from handset customers.
Continue to maintain EPS guidance despite market challenges.
Why it matters: Keeping EPS guidance shows confidence in earnings. This affects how investors feel.
Confirms:Management says EPS guidance is the same or higher.
Disproves:EPS guidance is lowered. This shows possible earnings problems.
Why it matters: Memory supply issues could limit Qualcomm's production and revenue growth. Addressing these constraints is key.
Confirms:Management announces a new deal. This deal helps with memory supply.
Disproves:There are more delays and worse supply problems.
Why it matters: This engagement could be key for Qualcomm's growth in the data center market.
Confirms:A press release will confirm the first shipments of custom silicon for data centers by the end of 2026.
Disproves:No news or delays about the first shipments of custom silicon.
Why it matters: This will show if Qualcomm can fix memory supply problems. It will also show if demand from Chinese customers is getting better.
Confirms one read:Q3 handset revenue guidance from Qualcomm is at least $7.9 billion.
Confirms the other:Q3 handset revenue guidance falls below $7.9 billion.
Why it matters: This report can change how the market feels and how Qualcomm's stock does.
Confirms one read:GDP growth is above 2%. This shows the economy is strong.
Confirms the other:GDP growth is below 1%. This shows the economy is weak.
New partnership enhances growth potential and valuation outlook.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 4, 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated (the Company) issued a press release regarding the Company’s financial results for its first quarter of fiscal 2026. A copy of that press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The press release includes Non-GAAP financial measures as defined in Regulation G. The press release also includes the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented…
Director — Christopher D. Young: Due to significant time commitment in his new role at Vertex, Inc.
Director — Kornelis (Neil) Smit: Mr. Smit is retiring from the Board after nearly 8 years of service.
Director — Dr. Jeremy (Zico) Kolter: Election of a new director to the Board.