Reading PTEN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PTEN free→Reading PTEN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PTEN free→NASDAQEnergyOil & Gas DrillingSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality cannot be assessed because the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been unsteady. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 36% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $11.49. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $11 PTEN trades at 1× p/s, below its 2× p/s peer median. Our $17 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $10–$14. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 31% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated weak grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=979).
Over the trailing year it converted -6.88x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.07 → $-0.05 (+24.8% / 30d). 2 raised, 0 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 4 maintained. 53% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 10.3% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$225.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$511.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,042.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Sticking to this capex discipline is crucial for financial health and future growth.
Confirms:Capex for 2026 is under $500 million.
Disproves:If capex goes over $500 million, it may mean overspending.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PTEN yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. The Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) was originally approved by the stockholders of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on June 3, 2021. On April 1, 2026, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the 2021 Plan to increa…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$10.00 – $14.00 (median $12.50) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-06-03
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Energy (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
FTI TechnipFMC | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
PR Permian Resources | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
OVV Ovintiv | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
VNOM Viper Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 49 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Energy names rated volatile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=252).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Maintain capital expenditures below $500 million for the full year 2026, net of asset sales.
Focus on refinancing debt and optimizing capital allocation to strengthen financial position.
Enhance cash flow from operations to support financial stability and growth.
Why it matters: Better cash flow shows improved performance. It helps with how money is spent.
Confirms:Q2 cash from operations exceeds Q1 results, showing a positive trend.
Disproves:Q2 cash from operations declines or stays below Q1 results.
Why it matters: Updates on debt management show how well the company is managing its debts.
Confirms one read:Management provides a clear plan for debt refinancing in the Q2 earnings call on July 22, 2026.
Confirms the other:Management does not talk about debt refinancing. They give unclear details in the Q2 call.
Why it matters: An increase in revenue growth could signal a positive shift in the energy sector.
Confirms one read:Energy sector revenue growth picks up to above 7% year over year.
Confirms the other:Energy sector revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Other Events. On June 4, 2026, the Company completed its previously announced redemption of all the approximately $482.5 million aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 3.95% Senior Notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”). The 2028 Notes were redeemed at a redemption price of 100.00% of the principal amount of the 2028 Notes outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The redemption of the 2028 Notes was funded using a portion of the net proceeds from the Company’s p…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 19, 2026, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) completed its previously announced offering (the “Offering”) of $500 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 6.050% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “Notes”). The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the Offering to redeem its outstanding 3.95% Senior Notes due 2028 and for general corporate purposes. The Notes were issued pursuant to the base indenture, dated as of November 1…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information described in
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 24, 2026, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into the Assignment and Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment”), which amends the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2025, by and among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the letter of credit issuers and lenders party thereto (as amended, the “Credit Agreemen…