Reading PR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PR free→Reading PR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PR free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas E&pSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company is unprofitable. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 51% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $19.51. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $20 PR trades at 18× p/e — 1.5× the 13× p/e peer median, and above its own 11× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $13 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $21–$27. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 53% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated strong grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=979).
Over the trailing year it converted -12.39x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.48 → $0.52 (+7.8% / 30d). 6 raised, 4 cut, 18 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 86% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 32.4% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$157.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$355.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,728.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: An increase in the oil production target would signal strong growth momentum for the company.
Confirms:Management announces an increase in the oil production target by 3.5 MBbls/d.
Disproves:No change to the oil production target in the upcoming earnings call.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 6, 2026, Permian Resources Corporation (the “Company” or “Permian Resources”) issued a press release announcing its financial and operational results for the first quarter of 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto. The information furnished pursuant to this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$21.00 – $27.00 (median $25.50) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-27
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PR Permian Resources | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
COP ConocoPhillips | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
EOG EOG Resources | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | full | moderate |
OXY Occidental Petroleum | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FANG Diamondback Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=329).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Permian Resources aims to increase its full year 2026 oil production target by 3.5 MBbls/d to 192.5 MBbls/d.
Permian Resources plans to maintain its cash capex budget between $1.75 billion and $1.95 billion for 2026.
Permian Resources has increased its quarterly base dividend to $0.16 per share.
Why it matters: The Q2 earnings report will show how well the company is doing financially. It will help investors understand if the company is improving or facing challenges.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings show revenue growth over 6% year over year.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings show revenue decline or flat growth year over year.
Why it matters: Changes in leadership can affect company direction and performance. New leaders may bring fresh ideas or strategies.
Confirms one read:The company shows better performance or new plans under the new leader.
Confirms the other:The company has problems or reports bad results after the leadership changes.
Why it matters: Changing the cash capex budget shows how the company manages its investments.
Confirms one read:Management confirms the cash capex budget remains between $1.75B and $1.95B.
Confirms the other:Management lowers the cash capex budget to below $1.75B.
Why it matters: The new credit agreement may affect how the company spends its money. Changes can signal a shift in strategy or financial health.
Confirms one read:The company shares a new investment plan or plans to spend more on projects.
Confirms the other:The company cuts spending or delays projects after the new credit deal.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 30, 2026, Permian Resources Operating, LLC (“OpCo”), a consolidated subsidiary of Permian Resources Corporation (“Permian Resources” and, together with OpCo, the “Company”) (NYSE: PR), entered into a new Credit Agreement (the “New Credit Agreement”) among OpCo, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), and the lenders party thereto (together with the Administrative Agent, the “Lenders”), providing for…
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 30, 2026, in connection with OpCo’s entry into the New Credit Agreement, OpCo terminated that certain Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2022 (as amended, supplement and amended and supplement, the “Prior Credit Agreement”) among OpCo, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Prior Credit Agreement and the credit facility thereunder were terminated by OpCo w…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth under
Shareholders approved an amendment to the long-term incentive plan.