Reading PL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PL free→Reading PL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PL free→
NYSEIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been steady, and it has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with performance compared to sector peers being below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 661% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $31.15. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $31, PL's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 35× p/s (9.5× the 4× p/s peer median). At a normal multiple the price implies ~648% near-term growth vs our ~30% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $4.16 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Analysts: $20–$53. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 648% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 30%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated weak grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=3678).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.36x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.03 → $-0.02 (+33.1% / 30d). 0 raised, 5 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 4 maintained. 64% of analysts rate Buy.
4 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 20.5% above current price.
1 positive, 0 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$385.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$797.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,023.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'cautious' to 'mixed'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
No named catalysts to watch right now. Check back after the next earnings report.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 5, 2026 , Planet Labs PBC, a Delaware public benefit corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Equity Distribution Agreement”) with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (“Goldman”), Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citigroup”), Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Citizens JMP Securities, LLC, Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Ne…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$20.00 – $53.00 (median $49.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-06-11
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Aerospace & Defense.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 16 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
GE GE Aerospace | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | moderate |
RTX RTX Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | fair | moderate |
BA Boeing | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 18 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
LMT Lockheed Martin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Industrials names rated stable grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=792).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue by entering into strategic agreements with major financial institutions.
Continue efforts to enhance gross profit margins through operational efficiencies.
Aim to reach positive operating income by reducing operating losses.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On June 4, 2026, Planet Labs PBC (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for its first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2026. The Company announced that it will hold a conference call and webcast to discuss these results at 5:00 p.m. eastern time on June 4, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein. The information in this Item 2.02, including the inf…