Reading PHM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PHM free→Reading PHM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PHM free→NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryResidential ConstructionSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality is fragile, and management's track record is volatile. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate. Peer multiples imply a price about 35% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $123.17. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $123 PHM trades at 12× p/e, below its 18× p/e peer median. Our $182 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $140–$162. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 32% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -4%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Not enough signal yet.
Over the trailing year it converted 0.93x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.35 → $2.35 (+0.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 12 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 56% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 0.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$117.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$330.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,260.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A larger decline would indicate weakening demand and could hurt future earnings.
Confirms:Q2 2026 home sale revenues drop more than 5% year over year.
Disproves:Home sale revenues increase or decline less than 5% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PHM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the earnings press release incorporated in such Item 2.02, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$140.00 – $162.00 (median $150.50) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-04-24
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Homebuilding.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
DHI D. R. Horton | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | fair | moderate |
LEN Lennar | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 29 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
NVR NVR, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | fair | moderate |
TOL Toll Brothers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | full | moderate |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=486).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Expand the share repurchase program with a $1.5 billion increase.
Focus on developing a land pipeline to support 3% to 5% annual community count growth.
Continue to focus on generating strong cash flows through disciplined asset management.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well PulteGroup is managing costs and sales in a tough market.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share is over $2.56. This shows strong performance despite market challenges.
Confirms the other:Earnings per share falls below $2.00, suggesting deeper issues in sales or costs.
Why it matters: A drop in net new orders could signal weakening demand in the housing market.
Confirms:Net new orders for Q2 are reported below 3% growth compared to Q1.
Disproves:Net new orders for Q2 show growth of 3% or more compared to Q1.
Why it matters: Falling orders would signal weaker demand and could impact future revenue.
Confirms:Net new orders fall below 6,000 homes in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Net new orders remain above 6,000 homes in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Land acquisition is key for future growth. Success here supports community growth plans.
Confirms:Management says they successfully bought land. This supports 3% to 5% growth in the community.
Disproves:Management says there are delays or problems with land buying plans.
Why it matters: A drop in gross margin may mean costs are rising. It could also mean incentives are hurting profits.
Confirms:Q2 home sale gross margin reported below 24%.
Disproves:Q2 home sale gross margin reported at 24% or higher.
Why it matters: News about the share buyback may show that management believes in the company's value.
Confirms:Management may announce more share buybacks or updates on the $1.5 billion increase.
Disproves:There were no updates about the share repurchase program in Q2.
Why it matters: Lower cash flow may mean financial trouble. This could affect future investments.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations falls below $1 billion in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations remains above $1 billion in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Weak cash flow could indicate challenges in managing costs and investments.
Confirms:Q2 cash flow from operations reported below $150 million.
Disproves:Q2 cash flow from operations reported at $150 million or higher.
OTHER EVENTS On April 23, 2026, the Company issued a separate press release announcing a $1.5 billion increase in its share repurchase program, effective April 22, 2026. A copy of this press release is filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On February 20, 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. (the “ Company ”) completed an underwritten public offering of a total of $800.0 million aggregate principal amount of its senior unsecured notes, consisting of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.250% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “ 2031 Notes ”) and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.900% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “ 2036 Notes ” and, together with the 2031 Notes, the “ Notes ”), i…
Other Events. On February 10, 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. (the “ Company ”) and each of its direct and indirect wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries that guarantees the Company’s existing senior unsecured revolving credit facility (collectively, the “ Guarantors ”) entered into an underwriting agreement (the “ Underwriting Agreement ”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., Truist Securities, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc., as representatives of the several underwriters named t…
Director — Kristin Gannon: The company appointed a new independent director to the board.