Reading PARR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PARR free→Reading PARR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PARR free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas Refining & MarketingSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but the capital stance is capital unfriendly, which may raise concerns. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, suggesting challenges ahead. Peer multiples imply a price about 22% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $55.82. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $56 PARR trades at 6× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $68 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $50–$79. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 18% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1255).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.89x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Energy names rated fragile grew net income 38% of the time over the next year (vs 44% for the rest of the cohort, n=602).
Most sensitive to long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $6.88 → $7.12 (+3.5% / 30d). 4 raised, 0 cut, 6 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 0 maintained. 86% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 40.1% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$243.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$498.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,621.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'mild_favorable' to 'mixed'.
Company momentum fell by 16.3 points (from 5.7 to -10.6).
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More net income shows better financial health and how well the company runs.
Confirms:Net income for Q2 2026 exceeds $54.5 million reported for Q1 2026.
Disproves:Net income for Q2 2026 falls below $54.5 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PARR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. Senior Notes Offering On May 14, 2026, Par Petroleum, LLC (the “Issuer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), completed the issuance of $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2034 (the “Notes”) in a private placement (the “Offering”) pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Notes were issued under an Indenture, d…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$50.00 – $79.00 (median $72.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-27
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PARR Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | fair | elevated |
VLO Valero Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | full | moderate |
MPC Marathon Petroleum | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | full | moderate |
PSX Phillips 66 | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | full | moderate |
DINO HF Sinclair | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Energy names rated neutral grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=329).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Complete and operate the Hawaii Renewable Fuels Facility to produce renewable fuels.
Complete the issuance of $500 million in senior unsecured notes to manage debt obligations.
Focus on increasing net income through operational efficiencies and strategic initiatives.
Repurchase $28 million of common stock at an average price of $37.96 per share during the first quarter of 2026.
Drive revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is vital for Par Pacific's market position. It reflects the effectiveness of their sales strategies.
Confirms:Q2 revenue is over $1.82 billion, showing strong sales.
Disproves:Q2 revenue is below $1.82 billion. This shows possible problems with market demand.
Why it matters: Sales volumes show how much consumers want the product and the health of the business.
Confirms:Retail segment fuel sales volumes decline more than 3.3% year over year.
Disproves:Retail segment fuel sales volumes increase or decline less than 3.3% year over year.
Why it matters: The new debt may change how flexible the finances are and affect future investments.
Confirms one read:Liquidity gets better after the debt is issued. Cash balance goes above $172.2 million.
Confirms the other:Liquidity goes down or stays the same even after the new debt is issued.
Why it matters: This debt issuance is a key part of Par Pacific's capital strategy. It could affect future financial flexibility and growth plans.
Confirms one read:The market reacts well. Credit ratings go up after the issuance.
Confirms the other:The market reacts poorly. Credit ratings fall after the issuance.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 5, 2026, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") issued a news release reporting results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. The news release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the foregoing information, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amend…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth in