Reading ODFL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ODFL free→Reading ODFL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ODFL free→NASDAQIndustrialsTruckingSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record is neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, ODFL is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 85% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $245.75. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $246 the market pays 51× p/e — above the 26× p/e peer median but in line with its own 51× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $131 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $201–$240. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 87% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality.
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.40x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.45 → $1.47 (+1.4% / 30d). 13 raised, 0 cut, 17 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 4 maintained. 33% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -2.5% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$163.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$345.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,606.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'mixed' to 'mild_favorable'.
The signal changed to "mild favorable." This indicates a positive shift. Risk remains moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind. Valuation is expensive.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A larger decline may indicate deeper issues in demand and impact revenue growth.
Confirms:LTL tons per day decline exceeds 7.7% year over year in Q2.
Disproves:LTL tons per day decline is less than or equal to 7.7% year over year in Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Fund exit raises concerns about valuation and risks.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Other Events. On May 21, 2026, the Company issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors had declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.29 per share of common stock, payable on June 17, 2026, to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 3, 2026. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$201.00 – $240.00 (median $224.00) · 14 analysts · as of 2026-06-05
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Cargo Ground Transportation.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ODFL Old Dominion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JBHT J.B. Hunt | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | full | moderate |
XPO XPO, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KNX Knight-Swift | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 27 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SAIA Saia | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on generating profitable revenue growth and increasing shareholder value over the long term.
Maintain disciplined capital expenditure management with a target of $265 million for 2026.
Commitment to increasing shareholder value through strategic initiatives and capital returns.
Why it matters: More buybacks may show management's trust in the company. This could help share price.
Confirms:Share buyback activity is over $88.1 million in the next quarter.
Disproves:Share repurchase activity falls below $88.1 million in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Higher spending may show strong growth plans. It could also mean fixing problems.
Confirms one read:Total capital spending is above $265 million for 2026.
Confirms the other:Total capital spending is below $265 million for 2026.
Why it matters: This growth shows good yield management. It may help revenue recovery.
Confirms:LTL revenue per hundredweight growth exceeds 4.4% compared to Q2 2025.
Disproves:LTL revenue per hundredweight growth falls below 4.4% compared to Q2 2025.
Why it matters: Updates on capital spending show how well the company controls costs. This impacts profits.
Confirms:Management says they spent less than $50 million this quarter.
Disproves:Capital spending is over $75 million for the quarter.
Why it matters: If the industrial sector's revenue growth speeds up, it may help Old Dominion's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth speeds up to over 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if revenue growth is improving or still mixed. This impacts investor confidence.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings show revenue growth above 8% year over year.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings show revenue growth below 0% year over year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 29, 2026, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. issued a press release regarding its financial results for its first quarter of 2026, ended March 31, 2026. A copy of this press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 4, 2026, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. issued a press release regarding its financial results for its fourth quarter of 2025, ended December 31, 2025. A copy of this press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1.
Director — Debra S. King: Ms. King resigned due to time commitments related to her other professional obligations.