Reading NKE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track NKE free→Reading NKE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track NKE free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryFootwear & AccessoriesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits may not be well-supported by cash. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive changes, and the capital stance is capital unfriendly. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which could impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 16% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $44.93. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $45 the market pays 30× p/e — above the 18× p/e peer median but in line with its own 31× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $31 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $35–$69. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 45% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 6%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality.
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.75x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $0.45. 0 raised, 11 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 1 downgrade / 30d, 2 maintained. 41% of analysts rate Buy.
4 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 17.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$120.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$321.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,617.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'full' to 'expensive'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Cost realignment is key to improving growth. Progress signals better financial health.
Confirms:Management says the progress score is over 60% for cost realignment efforts.
Disproves:Progress score remains below 40% or worsens.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Negative guidance impacts growth outlook and investor confidence.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition Today NIKE, Inc. issued a press release disclosing financial results for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2026. The text of the release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$35.00 – $69.00 (median $50.00) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-06-10
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
NKE Nike, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | full | moderate |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | moderate |
LULU Lululemon Athletica | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | full | moderate |
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=486).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management is focusing on realigning costs while investing to reignite growth.
The company is implementing 'Win Now' actions to enhance business performance.
Nike entered into a 364-Day Credit Agreement to enhance financial flexibility.
Threatens: Realign costs and invest to reignite growth
Stock slump pressures CEO's ability to realign costs and growth.
Threatens: Win Now actions to improve business
Analyst downgrade raises concerns about growth potential.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement 364-Day Credit Facility On March 6, 2026, NIKE, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a 364-Day Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other financial institutions named therein as lenders (the “364‑Day Credit Agreement”). The 364‑Day Credit Agreement provides for up to $1 billion of borrowings pursuant to a 364-day unsecured revolving credit facility (the “364‑Day Credit Facility”), which is available for working c…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement The information contained in
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement Termination of Prior 364-Day Credit Agreement On March 6, 2026, concurrently with the Company’s entry into the 364-Day Credit Agreement described in
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities NIKE, Inc.’s (the “Company”) management has been evaluating opportunities to operate more efficiently and profitably through realigning costs, while also investing to reignite growth. On February 27, the Company’s management approved a plan to implement certain organizational changes, which together with previously approved actions, are expected to result in pre-tax charges of approximately $300 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2…