Reading NEM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track NEM free→Reading NEM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track NEM free→NYSEMaterialsGoldSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 50% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts from NEM and the performance of sector bellwethers like RGLD, CDE, and AGI. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $100.23. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $100 NEM trades at 12× p/e, below its 25× p/e peer median. Our $195 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $129–$176. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 49% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 20%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1093).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.43x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Materials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=1297).
Most sensitive to the US dollar and the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.17 → $2.26 (+4.1% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 82% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 43.0% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$215.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$583.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,954.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Newmont is showing it cares by paying a dividend to shareholders.
Confirms:Declaration of a dividend of $0.26 per share for Q2 2026.
Disproves:No dividend declared for Q2 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for NEM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$129.00 – $176.00 (median $140.00) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-06-01
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Gold.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 35 of 100 | fair | high |
RGLD Royal Gold | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | full | moderate |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc | — | — | elevated |
HMY HARMONY GOLD MINING CO LTD | — | — | high |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Materials names rated neutral grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=272).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Newmont aims to maximize shareholder returns through a sustainable capital allocation framework.
Newmont plans to invest $1.95 billion in sustaining capital in 2026 to enhance asset longevity.
Newmont continues its share repurchase program, with an additional $6.0 billion authorization.
Newmont is committed to a sustainable cash dividend of $1.1 billion per year.
Newmont plans to invest $1.4 billion in development capital in 2026 to advance high-return projects.
Why it matters: If production reaches 1.3 million gold ounces, it shows strong operations.
Confirms:Q2 2026 gold production reported at or above 1.3 million ounces.
Disproves:In Q2 2026, gold production was below 1.3 million ounces.
Why it matters: Updates on the $6 billion share repurchase program can signal confidence in cash flow.
Confirms:They announced more share buybacks under the new $6 billion program.
Disproves:There were no updates or delays in the share buyback program.
Why it matters: How much is spent on sustaining capital can change production and stability.
Confirms one read:Sustaining capital spending is at or below $1.95 billion for 2026.
Confirms the other:Sustaining capital spending will be more than $1.95 billion in 2026.
Why it matters: Higher AISC may mean rising costs. This could affect profits and cash flow.
Confirms:Q2 2026 AISC reported above $1,680 per ounce.
Disproves:Q2 2026 AISC reported below $1,680 per ounce.
Chief Technical Officer — Francois Hardy: Mr. Francois Hardy is retiring after 24 years of service, and a successor process is underway.
and Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.