Reading MUR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MUR free→Reading MUR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MUR free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas E&pSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 136% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. If MUR cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $38.84. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $39 MUR trades at 38× p/e — 3.0× the 13× p/e peer median, and above its own 14× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $16 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $36–$48. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 138% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated strong grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=979).
Over the trailing year it converted 15.07x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Energy names rated robust grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 35% for the rest of the cohort, n=602).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.34 → $1.32 (-1.2% / 30d). 6 raised, 7 cut, 13 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 18% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 18.8% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$256.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$406.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,725.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Stability in operating income is crucial for Murphy Oil's growth plans. It shows how well costs are managed.
Confirms:Operating income is stable or higher than last quarter.
Disproves:Operating income drops by more than 5% from last quarter.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Increase cash from operations
Analysts see cash flow boost from rising crude prices.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers On June 11, 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation (the “Company”) announced that E. Ted Botner, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, will retire from his position as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, effective immediately, and will retire from the Company on June 30, 2026. Roger W. Landes, the…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$36.00 – $48.00 (median $43.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-06-04
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
COP ConocoPhillips | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
EOG EOG Resources | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | full | moderate |
OXY Occidental Petroleum | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FANG Diamondback Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Energy names rated stable grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 45% for the rest of the cohort, n=249).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on enhancing cash flow from operating activities to support financial stability.
Ensure consistent operating income to support overall financial health.
Improve net income to strengthen financial results and shareholder value.
Why it matters: Improving net income is key for investor confidence. A decline would signal ongoing issues.
Confirms:Q2 net income is over $52.9M. This is better than last quarter.
Disproves:Q2 net income falls below $52.9M. This shows ongoing money-making challenges.
Why it matters: Sector growth impacts Murphy Oil's performance. A rebound could signal better times ahead.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth shows a rise back toward 6 percent or higher.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth continues to decline or stays below 6 percent.
Why it matters: A rise in cash from operations shows the company is improving its cash flow. This aligns with management's priority to increase cash from operations.
Confirms:Q2 cash from operations exceeds $321.2M, showing growth from the previous year.
Disproves:Q2 cash from operations falls below $300.7M, indicating cash flow issues.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if cash from operations and net income are improving. This is key for investors.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows cash from operations up year over year by more than 10%.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows cash from operations down year over year.
Why it matters: Sector growth trends can impact Murphy Oil's performance. A return to growth can boost investor confidence.
Confirms:Revenue growth in the energy sector picks up to above 8% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth in the energy sector falls below 4% year over year.
Advances: Increase cash from operations
Analysts see cash flow boost from rising crude prices.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition The following information is furnished pursuant to Item 2.02, “Results of Operations and Financial Condition.” On May 6, 2026 Murphy Oil Corporation (“the Company”) issued a news release announcing its financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The full text of this news release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The Company also issued a quarterly stockholder update as a supplement to the earnings release, which is fur…