Reading MRSH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MRSH free→Reading MRSH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MRSH free→NYSEFinancialsInsurance BrokersSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may affect MRSH's performance compared to its peers, where it trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 21% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers, as these could significantly impact MRSH's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $168.68. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $169 MRSH trades at 18× p/e, in line with its 15× p/e peer median. Our $140 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $180–$225. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 20% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.33x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.91 → $2.90 (-0.3% / 30d). 2 raised, 15 cut, 21 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 39% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 15.3% above current price.
0 positive, 2 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 50% of the last 2 guided quarters · -16.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$105.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$215.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,703.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A big drop in operating income could show problems with cost management.
Confirms:Q2 operating income falls more than 12% from Q1.
Disproves:Q2 operating income stays the same or grows from Q1.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MRSH yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On June 2, 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) and certain of its domestic and foreign subsidiaries entered into a new Amended and Restated 5 Year Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2026, among the Company, as borrower, the designated subsidiaries party thereto as borrowers, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a multi…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$180.00 – $225.00 (median $193.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Insurance Brokers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh McLennan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | moderate |
AON Aon plc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | full | moderate |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | moderate |
WTW Willis Towers Watson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | fair | moderate |
BRO Brown & Brown | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | fair | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to achieve a 10% revenue growth for the fiscal year 2026.
Management aims to increase adjusted EPS by 8% to reach $3.29.
The Thrive program focuses on optimizing the global operating model to improve efficiency.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is a key goal for Marsh. A drop below 8% may signal trouble.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 8% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported at or above 8% year over year.
Why it matters: The Thrive program aims to optimize operations. Updates could show progress or setbacks.
Confirms one read:Management says the Thrive program has made big improvements.
Confirms the other:Management reports ongoing problems with the Thrive program.
Why it matters: The financial sector's growth affects Marsh McLennan's performance. A drop signals broader issues.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains at or above its median.
Why it matters: Adjusted EPS growth is important for investor confidence. A miss could raise concerns.
Confirms:Adjusted EPS growth reported below 8% for Q2.
Disproves:Adjusted EPS growth reported at or above 8% for Q2.
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement In connection with the New Facility, on June 2, 2026, the Company terminated its multi-currency unsecured $3.5 billion five-year revolving credit facility under the Amended and Restated 5 Year Credit Agreement, dated as of October11, 2023, among the Company, as borrower, the designated subsidiaries party thereto, as borrowers, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. On June 2, 2026 the Company entered into the Credit Agreement as described under
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 16, 2026 , Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. issued a press release reporting financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, and announcing that a conference call to discuss such results will be held at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time on April 16, 2026 . A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. For purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the press r…