Reading MRNA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MRNA free→Reading MRNA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MRNA free→
NASDAQHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is elevated and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 15% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers like VRTX, REGN, and ARGX. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $49.91. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $50 MRNA trades at 5× p/s, below its 9× p/s peer median. Our $130 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $30–$49. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 62% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -40%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated weak grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=2391).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.46x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=842).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-2.09 → $-2.09 (+0.1% / 30d). 6 raised, 4 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 17% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$191.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$621.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,551.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
The signal changed to mixed. Valuation shifted to fair.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Hitting this growth target will help Moderna recover its revenue.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth is reported at or above 10% compared to Q2 2025.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth falls below 5% compared to Q2 2025.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MRNA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 1, 2026, Moderna, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$30.00 – $49.00 (median $36.50) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-05-04
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Biotechnology.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MRNA Moderna | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
ABBV AbbVie | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | low |
AMGN Amgen | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | full | moderate |
GILD Gilead Sciences | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Moderna aims to achieve up to 10% revenue growth in 2026 compared to 2025.
Moderna aims to maintain a strong cash position with projected year-end cash and investments.
Moderna is focused on reducing GAAP operating expenses in 2026.
Why it matters: New funding could support cash flow and future projects.
Confirms:New government funding agreements or grants are announced.
Disproves:No new funding announcements in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Having enough cash is important. It helps pay for research and daily operations.
Confirms:Cash and investments reported at $4.5 billion or higher at year-end 2026.
Disproves:Cash and investments drop below $4.0 billion by year-end 2026.
Why it matters: Having strong cash is important for funding operations and growth.
Confirms:Cash position reported stable or increasing in Q2.
Disproves:Cash position was reported to be down in Q2.
Why it matters: If mRNA-1010 gets approved, it will be a big step for Moderna's flu vaccine.
Confirms:The FDA grants approval for mRNA-1010 before the August 5 PDUFA date.
Disproves:The FDA delays approval of mRNA-1010 past the August 5 date.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 3, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), Moderna, Inc. (the “Company”) and ModernaTX, Inc. (together with the Company, “Moderna”) and Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (“Arbutus”), Genevant Sciences GmbH (“Genevant” and, together with Arbutus, “Arbutus/Genevant”), and, solely for certain purposes, Genevant Sciences Ltd., entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve all patent infringement litigation between Moderna and Arb…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 13, 2026, Moderna, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of…