Reading MET? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MET free→Reading MET? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MET free→NYSEFinancialsInsurance - LifeSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, but compared with sector peers, MET is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 34% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $88.84. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $89 MET trades at 10× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $135 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $86–$102. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 34% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 4.55x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.44 → $2.39 (-2.1% / 30d). 4 raised, 5 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 6.8% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$94.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$266.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,744.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if MetLife's finances are getting better or worse.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows positive results and growth.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows more declines or does not meet expectations.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MET yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 6, 2025, MetLife, Inc. issued (i) a news release announcing its results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 (the “Earnings Release”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference, (ii) a Quarterly Financial Supplement for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 (the “Quarterly Financial Supplement”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference and (iii)…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$86.00 – $102.00 (median $95.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-05-26
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Life & Health Insurance.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
AFL Aflac | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | full | moderate |
PRU Prudential Financial | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | inexpensive | low |
PFG Principal Financial Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | fair | low |
UNM Unum | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 14 of 100 | full | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
MetLife aims to achieve double-digit growth in adjusted earnings per share.
MetLife aims to meet its variable investment income targets driven by private equity returns.
MetLife aims to maintain a two-year average annual ratio of free cash flow to adjusted earnings at 65% to 75%.
Why it matters: Adjusted earnings growth shows how well MetLife is managing its costs and investments. Strong growth supports the goal of double-digit EPS growth.
Confirms:Adjusted earnings for Q2 2026 increase year over year by more than 15%.
Disproves:Adjusted earnings for Q2 2026 grow less than 10% year over year.
Why it matters: Meeting the variable investment income target is key for overall earnings growth. It shows how well MetLife is investing its assets.
Confirms:Variable investment income for Q2 2026 is over $600 million.
Disproves:Variable investment income for Q2 2026 falls below $500 million.
Why it matters: A higher expense ratio may show inefficiencies. A low ratio helps make more money.
Confirms:The expense ratio for Q2 2026 is below 20%.
Disproves:The expense ratio for Q2 2026 rises above 21%.
Why it matters: Meeting the EPS growth target shows MetLife's ability to grow profits. This is key to investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 EPS growth meets or exceeds 10%.
Disproves:Q2 EPS growth falls below 5%.
Why it matters: Better cash flow means MetLife manages its money well. This can help with future investments and dividends.
Confirms:Free cash flow ratio improves above 40%.
Disproves:Free cash flow ratio drops below 30%.
Other Events. On May 15, 2026, MetLife, Inc. issued a news release announcing the declaration of (i) a quarterly dividend of $0.31190376 per share on MetLife, Inc.’s floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series A, $25 liquidation preference per share; (ii) a quarterly dividend of $351.5625 per share on MetLife, Inc.’s 5.625% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series E, $25,000 liquidation preference per share, which is $0.3515625 per depositary share, each representing a 1/1,000th intere…