Reading MCK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MCK free→Reading MCK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MCK free→
NYSEHealth CareMedical DistributionSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair. If MCK cuts guidance on the next call, that's a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $784.05. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $784 MCK trades at 20× p/e, in line with its 19× p/e peer median. Our $797 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $875–$1,085. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 2% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.29x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, the broad stock market, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Health Care names rated volatile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=600).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $9.56 → $9.66 (+1.0% / 30d). 3 raised, 2 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 88% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$96.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$273.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,717.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Confirming the EPS guidance shows strong growth and good operations.
Confirms:Fiscal 2027 adjusted EPS guidance confirmed within the range of $43.80 to $44.60.
Disproves:Guidance lowered below $43.80. This shows weaker growth expectations.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MCK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 9, 2026, certain of McKesson Corporation’s (the “Company”) subsidiaries, including McKesson Medical-Surgical Top Holdings, Inc. (the “Borrower”), entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement , dated as of April 1, 2026, among, the Borrower, the lenders from time to time party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”), to provide for a $2,…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$875.00 – $1085.00 (median $1050.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-08
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MCK McKesson Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | fair | moderate |
LLY Lilly (Eli) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | expensive | low |
ABBV AbbVie | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | low |
UNH UnitedHealth Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 43.9% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
McKesson continues to reaffirm its long-term EPS growth targets of 13% to 16%.
McKesson aims to expand its Oncology & Multispecialty segment through acquisitions and provider solutions.
McKesson is optimizing its portfolio by divesting non-core assets, including exiting European operations.
McKesson increased its share repurchase authorization by $5.0 billion, bringing the total to $7.7 billion.
Management has consistently raised EPS guidance for fiscal 2026 over multiple quarters.
Why it matters: Updates on the share buyback program show how McKesson uses capital.
Confirms:There was news of more share buybacks or an increase in buyback limits.
Disproves:No more share buybacks or a cut in buyback authorization.
Why it matters: If the outlook is confirmed, it shows trust in the company's growth.
Confirms:Management will confirm the fiscal 2026 outlook in the next earnings call.
Disproves:Management cuts the outlook for fiscal 2026.
Why it matters: The new CFO's methods may change financial choices and company plans.
Confirms one read:The new CFO outlines a clear financial strategy that aligns with company goals.
Confirms the other:The transition may cause uncertainty or changes in financial plans.
Why it matters: Finalizing the credit deal would give more financial options and help growth.
Confirms:Management says the new credit agreement is done.
Disproves:There are delays or problems in finalizing the new credit agreement.
Why it matters: An increase in EPS guidance would show stronger growth expectations for the company.
Confirms:Management raises EPS guidance for fiscal 2026 during the next earnings call.
Disproves:Management maintains or lowers EPS guidance for fiscal 2026.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, McKesson Corporation (the “Company”) reported the Company’s preliminary results for the quarter and fiscal year ended on March 31, 2026 which are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The information contained in this Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), but shall not be deemed “filed” with the Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 24, 2026, McKesson Corporation (“McKesson” or the “Company”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”) among the Company, as borrower, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other parties thereto. The New Revolving Credit Facility replaces the Company’s existing $1.0 billion 364-day senior unsecured revolving credit facility, dated as of May 8, 2025 (the “Existing 364-D…
I tem 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information in
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 1, 2026, certain of McKesson Corporation’s (the “Company”) subsidiaries, including McKesson Medical-Surgical Top Holdings, Inc. (the “Borrower”), entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with the lenders and issuing banks party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent providing for (i) a $750.0 million senior secured term “A” loan facility due 2031 (the “Term Loan A-1 Facility”), (i…