Reading MARA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MARA free→Reading MARA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MARA free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologyCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been steady, and it has a capital-friendly approach. Risk is high, and compared with sector peers, it is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 12% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening, priced roughly in line with peers, but recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $14.08. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $14 MARA trades at 20× p/e, below its 28× p/e peer median. Our $16 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $7.00–$17. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 12% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 100%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.41x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.51 → $-0.30 (+41.2% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 3 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 54% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -11.7% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$340.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$784.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $7,053.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Revenue trends will show if MARA's changes are working.
Confirms one read:Q2 revenue is much better than Q1's $174.6 million.
Confirms the other:Q2 revenue declines further or remains below Q1's level.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MARA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 11, 2026, MARA Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a shareholder letter announcing its financial results for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026. The Company also issued a press release announcing its earnings webcast and conference call to be held on May 11, 2026. The full text of the shareholder letter and press release are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and Exhibit 99.2, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. The…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$7.00 – $17.00 (median $9.25) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-06-03
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Information Technology (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 0 of 100 | fair | high |
FLEX Flex Ltd. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | elevated |
TWLO Twilio | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 30 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
MKSI MKS Instruments | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on acquiring assets like Long Ridge to expand digital infrastructure capabilities.
Improve operational cash flow through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Advance AI and IT infrastructure through strategic partnerships and site conversions.
MARA Holdings is focused on strategic acquisitions to enhance its market position.
MARA Holdings aims to improve its operating income through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: Closing the Long Ridge deal will enhance MARA's digital infrastructure and cash flow.
Confirms:Long Ridge is now acquired. All regulatory approvals are in place.
Disproves:The acquisition does not close. It faces delays due to regulatory problems.
Why it matters: Signing tenants shows demand for MARA's digital infrastructure. It will also bring cash flow.
Confirms:One or more tenant leases for Long Ridge are signed by year-end.
Disproves:No tenant leases are signed by year-end, indicating weak demand.
Why it matters: Progress in the Starwood partnership may improve MARA's infrastructure and cash flow.
Confirms:There is good progress in permitting and site preparations.
Disproves:No updates on the partnership are reported. This may mean operational problems.
Why it matters: Stable cash flow is key for growth. It shows how well the company runs.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations improves from -$247.5M in Q1 2026 to less negative in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations declines further in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Successful execution of this acquisition could strengthen MARA's market position. It is key for growth.
Confirms:Completion of the acquisition by the end of Q2 2026.
Disproves:The deal is delayed or canceled. This affects growth plans.
Why it matters: Better income is important for MARA's finances. It shows how well management is doing.
Confirms:Operating income improves from -$1,061.5M in Q1 2026 to less negative in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Operating income worsens or stays the same in Q2 2026.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On April 29, 2026, MARA USA Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“ Buyer ”) and a subsidiary of MARA Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “ Company ”), and (solely for the purposes of Articles V, IX, and X thereof) the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “ Purchase Agreement ”) with Ohio River Partners Holdco LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ ORPH ”), Ohio River Partners Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability com…