Reading MANH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MANH free→Reading MANH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MANH free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Compared with sector peers, MANH is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 51% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. This is because it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. If MANH cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $142.92. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $143 the market pays 28× p/e — above the 21× p/e peer median but in line with its own 52× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $96 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $145–$239. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 49% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.84x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.32 → $1.32 (+0.1% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 11 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 47.7% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$197.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$401.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,697.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More cash from operations helps management focus on better spending of funds.
Confirms:Q2 cash from operations was over $20 million.
Disproves:Q2 cash from operations was under $15 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MANH yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. On June 1, 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (“Manhattan”) initiated plans to reduce its global headcount by approximately 6%, leveraging increased operational efficiencies and allowing it to focus investments on key strategic priorities. Manhattan estimates that it will incur expenses, substantially all in cash, of approximately $7 million to $9 million in the second quarter of 2026, consisting of severance and other one-time termination bene…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$145.00 – $239.00 (median $200.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-05-20
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MANH Manhattan Associates | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | elevated |
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to prioritize revenue growth as a key strategic focus.
Improve operating income through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Focus on increasing cash flow from operations to support strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could indicate a slowdown in the company's performance.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 10%.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported above 15%.
Why it matters: More cuts might show bigger problems with cost management and efficiency.
Confirms:They announced cuts to headcount of more than 6%.
Disproves:No more headcount cuts were announced and efficiency got better.
Why it matters: This means the company is having a hard time improving its cash flow. Cash flow is very important for management.
Confirms:Cash from operations growth in Q2 is reported below 10%.
Disproves:Cash from operations growth in Q2 is reported at 10% or higher.
Why it matters: This shows the company is getting better at working efficiently. It is moving closer to its goal of making more money.
Confirms:Operating income growth in Q2 exceeds 10% year over year.
Disproves:Operating income growth in Q2 is 10% or less year over year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 21, 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (“we”, “our”, or the “Company”) issued a press release providing its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. A copy of this press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1. Pursuant to General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, this exhibit is “furnished” and not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Non-GAAP Financial Measures in the Press Release The pre…
Approval of an amendment to the equity incentive plan.