Reading MAA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MAA free→Reading MAA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MAA free→NYSEReal EstateReit - ResidentialSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been steady, while risk is low. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, MAA is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 27% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. If MAA cuts guidance on the next call, that could have a meaningful negative impact. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $138.93. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $139 the market pays 42× p/e — above the 18× p/e peer median but in line with its own 35× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $111 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $120–$152. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 25% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1968).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.65x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 47% for the rest of the cohort, n=1866).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.82 → $0.78 (-5.1% / 30d). 0 raised, 3 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 1 downgrade / 30d, 3 maintained. 40% of analysts rate Buy.
4 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 6.6% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 1 guided quarters · -60.7% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$61.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$186.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,950.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show financial health and future plans.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows a big win compared to what analysts expected.
Confirms the other:Earnings report falls short of what analysts expected.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MAA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operati ons and Financial Condition. On April 29, 2026, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (“MAA”) issued a press release announcing its consolidated results of operations and financial condition as of March 31, 2026 and for the three months then ended (the “Press Release”). Copies of the Press Release and supplemental data schedules are furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and Exhibit 99.2, respectively, to this Current Report. The information in this Current Report under this Item 2.02…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$120.00 – $152.00 (median $137.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-06-10
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Multi-Family Residential REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MAA Mid-America Apartment Communities | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | low |
AVB AvalonBay Communities | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 33 of 100 | full | low |
EQR Equity Residential | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | low |
ESS Essex Property Trust | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | full | low |
SUI Sun Communities Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 5 of 100 | expensive | low |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to uphold the Core FFO guidance for the fiscal year 2026.
Provide updates on the forecasted Core FFO per Share for the fiscal year 2026.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if the company keeps its good performance after the last report.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings beat expectations. This shows strong performance in operations.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings miss expectations. This may mean there are problems in operations.
Why it matters: If revenue growth speeds up, it could signal a positive shift in the real estate sector.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth shows a year-over-year increase of more than 2%.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth declines year-over-year by more than 2%.
Why it matters: Maintaining Core FFO guidance shows the company's ability to generate steady cash flow. This is key for investor confidence.
Confirms:Management says Core FFO guidance will stay the same in the next earnings report.
Disproves:Management lowers Core FFO guidance during the earnings call.
Why it matters: Faster revenue growth would show a positive change in the real estate sector.
Confirms:Revenue growth exceeds 7% year over year in upcoming reports.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains below 7% year over year.
Why it matters: An updated forecast shows how management views earnings growth. It can impact stock sentiment.
Confirms:Management raises the Core FFO per Share forecast for 2026 during the earnings call.
Disproves:Management lowers the Core FFO per Share forecast for 2026 during the earnings call.