Reading LZB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LZB free→Reading LZB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LZB free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future growth. Compared with sector peers, LZB is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 16% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $38.49. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $38 LZB trades at 14× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $46 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 16% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.84x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated robust grew net income 65% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.49 → $0.49 (+0.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$129.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$293.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,626.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Unemployment claims data can indicate consumer spending trends. High claims may hurt La-Z-Boy's sales.
Confirms:Unemployment claims are much higher than last week's numbers.
Disproves:Unemployment claims fall or remain stable compared to previous weeks.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LZB yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
No material events in the last 90 days.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Home Furnishings.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LZB La-Z-Boy, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | fair | moderate |
SGI Somnigroup International | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 27 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
MHK Mohawk Industries | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ALH Alliance Laundry Holdings, Inc. | — | expensive | moderate |
LEG Leggett & Platt | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
No qualifying priorities for this snapshot. Check back after the next refresh.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a change in the sector's growth phase. This would impact La-Z-Boy's performance in the consumer discretionary market.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported below the median for the sector in the next earnings report.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains at or above the median for the sector.
Why it matters: Retail sales data shows how much people are spending. This affects La-Z-Boy's sales.
Confirms one read:The retail sales report shows an increase that is better than expected.
Confirms the other:The retail sales report shows a drop or does not meet expectations.
Why it matters: Consumer spending affects furniture sales. A rise could boost La-Z-Boy's sales.
Confirms:Advance Monthly Retail Trade Report shows retail sales growth above 1.5%.
Disproves:Retail sales growth is less than 0%. This shows weak consumer spending.
Why it matters: Inflation affects consumer spending. A lower CPI could boost sales for La-Z-Boy.
Confirms:CPI shows a month-over-month decrease of more than 0.2%.
Disproves:CPI increases by more than 0.3%, signaling rising inflation.