Reading LSTR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LSTR free→Reading LSTR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LSTR free→
NASDAQIndustrialsIntegrated Freight & LogisticsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but the sector backdrop is a headwind. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is moderate. Peer multiples imply a price about 89% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, particularly how major players like UPS and FDX perform. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $224.27. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $224 LSTR trades at 52× p/e — 2.2× the 23× p/e peer median, and above its own 21× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $114 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $157–$240. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 96% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -10%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.98x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.47 → $1.47 (+0.4% / 30d). 14 raised, 0 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 12% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 9.3% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 7.1% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$110.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$272.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,740.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The company is on track to maintain dividend growth. An announcement would confirm this.
Confirms:Announcement of a dividend increase in the next quarter.
Disproves:No dividend increase is announced in the next quarter.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LSTR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 28, 2026, Landstar System, Inc. (“Landstar” or the “Company”) issued a press release announcing results for the first quarter of fiscal 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The information contained in
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$157.00 – $240.00 (median $191.50) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-06-05
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Cargo Ground Transportation.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LSTR Landstar System | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ODFL Old Dominion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JBHT J.B. Hunt | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | full | moderate |
XPO XPO, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KNX Knight-Swift | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 27 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth to improve overall financial performance.
Continue efforts to enhance operating income through cost management and efficiency improvements.
Commitment to maintaining dividend growth as part of capital allocation strategy.
Why it matters: Growing dividends show strong cash flow and support for shareholders. This can attract income investors.
Confirms:Dividend per share increases to at least $0.42 in Q2.
Disproves:Dividend per share stays at $0.40 or decreases in Q2.
Why it matters: The company must increase its operating income. This increase is important.
Confirms:Operating income increases by more than 5% in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income grows less than 5% in Q2.
Why it matters: The industrial sector is growing up. Faster revenue growth could help Landstar.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth speeds up above 8% each year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains below 6% year over year.
Why it matters: The company is behind on its revenue growth goal. Improvement signals better performance.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 6% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth is below 6% year over year.
Why it matters: Stable sector growth could help Landstar's revenue. It may show a recovery is starting.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth stabilizes above 3% year over year.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth declines below 1% year over year.