Reading LMT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LMT free→Reading LMT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LMT free→
NYSEIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while earnings quality is neutral and management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with the company compared to sector peers being typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 39% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. The outlook hinges on whether LMT cuts guidance on the next call or if sector bellwethers continue to perform well. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $540.33. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $540 LMT trades at 26× p/e, below its 38× p/e peer median. Our $906 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $575–$700. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 40% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 6%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.54x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated stable grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=792).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $7.20 → $7.19 (-0.1% / 30d). 3 raised, 2 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 29% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 40.4% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$114.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$251.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,515.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Free cash flow is key for funding growth and returning value to shareholders. A drop would raise concerns.
Confirms:Q2 free cash flow reported worse than $(291) million.
Disproves:Q2 free cash flow improves to above $(291) million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Achieve sales and profit growth
New contract supports sales and profit growth objectives.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026 , Lockheed Martin Corporation issued a news release reporting its financial results for the quarter ended March 29, 2026. A copy of the news release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$575.00 – $700.00 (median $624.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-04-26
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Aerospace & Defense.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
GE GE Aerospace | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | moderate |
RTX RTX Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | fair | moderate |
BA Boeing | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 18 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
HWM Howmet Aerospace | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving approximately 5% sales and 25% operating profit growth year-over-year.
Continue to maintain free cash flow between $6.5 and $6.8 billion for 2026.
Focus on delivering EPS growth with guidance set between $29.35 and $30.25 for 2026.
Why it matters: Operating profit margin shows how well a company uses its resources. A drop may mean higher costs or problems.
Confirms:Q2 operating profit margin was less than 10.6%.
Disproves:Q2 operating profit margin was more than 10.6%.
Why it matters: These deals could increase production and revenue. This shows strong demand for the future.
Confirms:Look for new contracts or higher production rates from these agreements.
Disproves:No updates or delays in the production agreements.
Why it matters: This report will show if Lockheed Martin meets its sales and profit growth goals. Investors will focus on earnings per share growth.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share growth reported above 5% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings per share growth reported below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: The industrial sector is slowing. Signs of growth could indicate a better environment for Lockheed Martin.
Confirms:Revenue growth in the industrial sector is speeding up. It is now above 10% over 3 years.
Disproves:3-year revenue growth in the industrial sector stays below 5%.
Why it matters: Sales growth is a sign of demand and operational health. Weak growth could signal deeper issues.
Confirms:Q2 sales grew less than 5% compared to last year.
Disproves:Q2 sales growth exceeds 5% year-over-year.
Threatens: Achieve sales and profit growth
F-35 mission capability issues may hinder sales growth.
Advances: Achieve sales and profit growth
New contracts directly support sales and profit growth.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On January 29, 2026 , Lockheed Martin Corporation issued a news release reporting its financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the news release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,…
Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement. On December 5, 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation (the “Company”) entered into a new 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement (the “364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement”), among the Company, as borrower, the lenders listed therein (the “Lenders”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Citibank, N.A., Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as documentation agents, and Bank of Ame…