Reading LII? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LII free→Reading LII? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LII free→NYSEIndustrialsBuilding Products & EquipmentSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is fragile, meaning profits lack cash support. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, LII is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 25% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $512.15. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $512 the market pays 23× p/e — above the 18× p/e peer median but in line with its own 23× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $409 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $535–$650. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 25% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -2%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.02x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated fragile grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $7.60 → $7.61 (+0.1% / 30d). 7 raised, 10 cut, 18 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 37% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$142.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$370.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,377.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Changes in EPS guidance may show how management views profits and costs.
Confirms one read:Management maintains or raises EPS guidance for 2026 within the range of $23.50 to $25.00.
Confirms the other:Management lowers EPS guidance below the current range of $23.50 to $25.00.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LII yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Director — Sivasankaran Somasundaram: Resigned due to other professional responsibilities and time commitments.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$535.00 – $650.00 (median $597.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-04-30
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Building Products.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LII Lennox International | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | full | moderate |
TT Trane Technologies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JCI Johnson Controls | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | low |
CARR Carrier Global | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
MAS Masco | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | moderate |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Lennox aims for 8% revenue growth in 2026, with 4% from acquisitions.
Lennox aims to maintain its EPS guidance range of $23.50 to $25.00 for 2026.
Lennox plans to manage capital expenditures to approximately $250 million for 2026.
Why it matters: A larger decline would signal ongoing weakness in new home construction and demand.
Confirms:Q2 Home Comfort Solutions revenue down year over year worse than -10%.
Disproves:Home Comfort Solutions revenue stabilizes or grows year over year.
Why it matters: Growth in this segment is important for the company. It helps balance weaknesses in other areas.
Confirms:Building Climate Solutions revenue grew over 26% compared to last year.
Disproves:Building Climate Solutions revenue grew less than 20% compared to last year.
Why it matters: Achieving 8% revenue growth is a key goal for 2026. It shows the company's recovery and growth potential.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported at or above 8% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 6% year over year.
and Exhibit 99.1 of this report is being “furnished” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section. Furthermore, such information shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, unless specifically identified as b…
and Exhibit 99.1 of this report is being “furnished” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section. Furthermore, such information shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, unless specifically identified as b…
The filing describes a change in compensatory arrangements for certain officers.