Reading LEA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LEA free→Reading LEA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LEA free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryAuto PartsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a headwind, which could impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 30% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. If LEA cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $145.16. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $145 LEA trades at 11× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $212 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $115–$150. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 32% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 6%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.49x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated robust grew net income 65% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.82 → $3.87 (+1.2% / 30d). 6 raised, 5 cut, 14 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 38% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$134.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$290.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,898.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well Lear is doing financially. It can affect stock price.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share beats analyst expectations by more than 5%.
Confirms the other:Earnings per share falls short of analyst expectations by more than 5%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LEA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 1, 2026, Lear Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the first quarter of 2026 and reaffirming its financial outlook for the full year 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein. The information contained in this Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amende…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$115.00 – $150.00 (median $133.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-05-05
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Automotive Parts & Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LEA Lear | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
BWA BorgWarner | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | moderate |
MOD Modine Manufacturing Co. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 49 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
APTV Aptiv | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
AUR Aurora Innovation Inc | — | — | elevated |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management continues to reaffirm its financial outlook for the full year 2026 across all metrics.
The company is committed to maintaining its dividend per share at $0.77.
Why it matters: Reaffirming the outlook shows confidence in future growth. It can boost investor trust.
Confirms:Lear confirms its 2026 financial outlook in a public statement or press release.
Disproves:Lear lowers its 2026 financial outlook in all updates.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend steady signals financial health. It reassures investors about cash flow.
Confirms:Lear maintains the dividend at $0.77 in its next earnings announcement.
Disproves:Lear cuts the dividend below $0.77 in its next earnings announcement.
Why it matters: Reaffirming the 2026 outlook shows Lear's ability to grow. This matters for investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth meets or exceeds 5% year-over-year growth.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth falls below 2% year-over-year.