Reading JPM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JPM free→Reading JPM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JPM free→NYSEFinancialsBanks - DiversifiedSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, with earnings quality being fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is low, but the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 7% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include the performance of sector bellwethers and any shifts in interest rates. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $320.72. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $321 JPM trades at 16× p/e, in line with its 15× p/e peer median. Our $294 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Analysts: $295–$361. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 9% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted -1.83x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated fragile grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $5.38 → $5.39 (+0.1% / 30d). 3 raised, 1 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$92.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$236.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,547.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong cash flow is vital for JPMorgan's capital allocation. It affects future investments.
Confirms one read:Cash flow remains stable or increases in Q2 compared to Q1.
Confirms the other:Cash flow decreases in Q2 compared to Q1.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Partnership enhances growth potential in AI sector.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders. On May 7, 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (the “Company”) issued 300,000 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s 6.100% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series PP, par value of $1.00 per share and with a liquidation preference of $10,000 per share (the “Series PP Preferred Stock”), which Shares were deposited against delivery of depositary receipts (the “Depositary Receipts”) evidencing 3,000,000 depositary shares (the “Depositary…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$295.00 – $361.00 (median $336.00) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-04-17
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Financials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 35 of 100 | full | low |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | full | moderate |
V Visa Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | low |
MA Mastercard | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | expensive | low |
BAC Bank of America | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing net income through various strategic initiatives.
Continue to enhance operating income through strategic measures.
Focus on maintaining strong cash flow to support operations and growth.
Why it matters: Better operating income is key for JPMorgan's growth. It shows how healthy the business is.
Confirms:Operating income increases by more than 3% in Q2 compared to Q1.
Disproves:Operating income decreases or stays flat in Q2 compared to Q1.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth could signal broader challenges for JPMorgan.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: Net income growth shows if JPMorgan is improving its earnings. This is key for investors.
Confirms:Q2 net income grows by more than 5% compared to Q1.
Disproves:Q2 net income growth is less than 0% compared to Q1.
Why it matters: Strong cash flow is key for JPMorgan's growth plans and capital allocation.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations increases by more than 10% quarter over quarter.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations decreases or stays flat quarter over quarter.
Partnership enhances growth potential in AI sector.
Subpoenas may lead to regulatory scrutiny affecting operations.
Investment in a volatile region may impact cash flow.
Victory in lawsuit enhances JPMorgan's legal standing and operational stability.
Subpoenas could impact JPMorgan's operations and reputation.
Repetition of previous event, same implications.
Continued legal scrutiny could hinder growth objectives.