Reading JBHT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JBHT free→Reading JBHT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JBHT free→
NASDAQIndustrialsIntegrated Freight & LogisticsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, JBHT is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 25% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $289.36. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $289 JBHT trades at 45× p/e — 1.7× the 26× p/e peer median, and above its own 29× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $238 fair value is medium-confidence here. Analysts: $180–$320. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 22% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.62x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.70 → $1.70 (+0.2% / 30d). 3 raised, 1 cut, 20 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 57% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 10.5% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$137.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$265.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,587.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'mild_favorable' to 'mixed'.
The signal changed to mixed. Risk fell. The sector backdrop remains a headwind. Valuation is described as expensive.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Lower EPS growth may show weaker profits and hurt investor trust.
Confirms:Quarterly EPS growth falls below 20% compared to the same quarter last year.
Disproves:Quarterly EPS growth exceeds 20% compared to the same quarter last year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for JBHT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION. On April 15,2026, we issued a news release announcing our revenues and earnings for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$180.00 – $320.00 (median $242.50) · 14 analysts · as of 2026-06-05
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Cargo Ground Transportation.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
JBHT J.B. Hunt | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | full | moderate |
ODFL Old Dominion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
XPO XPO, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KNX Knight-Swift | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 27 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SAIA Saia | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue leveraging investments in people, technology, and capacity to drive long-term value.
Focus on reducing structural costs and improving productivity across the organization.
Enhance network efficiency in the Intermodal segment to drive growth and mode conversion.
Why it matters: Progress in this project is key for long-term profits and efficiency.
Confirms:Management says there are big improvements in the cost to serve project.
Disproves:No progress reported on the cost to serve initiative.
Why it matters: Cutting costs can help J.B. Hunt make more money and improve its margins.
Confirms:Management says costs to serve went down in Q2.
Disproves:No improvement in cost to serve reported in Q2.
Why it matters: A slowdown in Intermodal revenue growth may mean demand is weakening in this key area.
Confirms:Intermodal segment revenue growth below 2% year over year in Q2.
Disproves:Intermodal segment revenue growth remains above 2% year over year in Q2.
Why it matters: A drop could mean pricing pressure and hurt overall profits.
Confirms:Revenue per load in Intermodal segment declines more than 2% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue per load in Intermodal segment increases or stays flat year over year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION. On January 15, 2026, we issued a news release announcing our revenues and earnings for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT See the information set forth in
TERMINATION OF A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT See the information set forth in
CREATION OF A DIRECT FINANCIAL OBLIGATION On November 25, 2025, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and its principal operating subsidiary, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (collectively, “we” or the “Company”), entered into a $1.7 billion Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 25, 2025, by and among J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc., as borrower, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., as parent guarantor, the lenders named therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. This…