Reading J? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track J free→Reading J? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track J free→NYSEIndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is mixed. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes, and the capital stance is capital unfriendly. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, although compared with sector peers, J is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 36% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $127.00. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $127 J trades at 19× p/e, below its 34× p/e peer median. Our $194 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $150–$169. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 35% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 10%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.50x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.89 → $1.83 (-3.3% / 30d). 1 raised, 11 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 65% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 31.3% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 1 guided quarters · -7.2% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$120.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$296.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,444.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
As of June 12, 2026, valuation fell. The sector backdrop is a headwind. Risk remains moderate, and management is volatile.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This would indicate a slowdown in business momentum after strong Q2 results.
Confirms:Q3 adjusted net revenue growth comes in below 8.0% year over year.
Disproves:Q3 adjusted net revenue growth meets or exceeds 10.5% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for J yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
99.1 Press Release dated May 5, 2026 announcing the Company’s financial results for the quarter ended March 27, 2026 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document The information disclosed pursuant to Items 2.02 and 9.01 in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the exhibits, shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$150.00 – $169.00 (median $163.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-06-11
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Construction & Engineering.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
J Jacobs Solutions | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
PWR Quanta Services | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FIX Comfort Systems USA | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
EME Emcor | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | moderate |
MTZ MasTec | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
11 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Jacobs has raised its FY 2026 guidance for the second consecutive quarter, reflecting strong business momentum.
Jacobs completed the acquisition of the remaining stake in PA Consulting, increasing cost synergy estimates.
Jacobs has strategically repurchased $472 million of its shares year-to-date, optimizing capital structure.
Why it matters: Finishing this purchase would boost Jacobs' consulting skills and growth plans.
Confirms:They announce the successful end of the PA Consulting purchase.
Disproves:They announce delays or that the purchase will not happen.
Why it matters: More share buybacks would show strong cash flow and a promise to return money to investors.
Confirms:They announce share buybacks over $252 million in the next quarter.
Disproves:They do not announce any big share buybacks in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Slower backlog growth could indicate weakening demand in key sectors.
Confirms:Q3 backlog growth comes in below 20% year over year.
Disproves:Q3 backlog growth meets or exceeds 22% year over year.
Why it matters: More savings would show the integration is working. This could lead to more growth.
Confirms:Management says PA Consulting will save more than $20 million each year.
Disproves:Savings are less than $16 million in the 24 months after the deal.
Why it matters: A slowdown might show less confidence in cash flow or spending plans.
Confirms:Share repurchases in Q3 drop below $200 million.
Disproves:Share repurchases in Q3 exceed $300 million.
Director — Diane Bryant: Diane Bryant resigned as a member of the Board of Directors.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Revolving Credit Agreement On March 16, 2026, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (the “Company”), Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ( “JEGI”) and certain of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into a credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) with the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., BNP Paribas and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as co-syndication agents, The Tor…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant The information set forth in
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 3, 2026, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) completed the previously announced offering (the “Offering”) of $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 4.750% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes”) and $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 5.375% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2036 Notes” and, together with the 2031 Notes, the “Notes”). The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantees”) by Jacobs Engineering…