Reading IR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track IR free→Reading IR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track IR free→
NYSEIndustrialsSpecialty Industrial MachinerySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and the company has a capital-friendly stance. However, the sector backdrop is a headwind, which could impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 7% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $74.00. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $74 IR trades at 22× p/e, below its 24× p/e peer median. Our $79 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $80–$115. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 6% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.21x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.83 → $0.82 (-0.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 56% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.6% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$146.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$309.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,058.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This acquisition will help Ingersoll Rand get better at dosing pumps.
Confirms:Announcement confirming the acquisition of Fox s.r.l. has closed.
Disproves:Delay or cancellation of the Fox s.r.l. acquisition.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for IR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any of Ingersoll Rand’s filings with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$80.00 – $115.00 (median $99.00) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-06-03
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
IR Ingersoll Rand | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | fair | moderate |
PH Parker Hannifin | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
ITW Illinois Tool Works | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | fair | moderate |
GWW W. W. Grainger | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
DOV Dover Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | fair | low |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Ingersoll Rand aims to achieve a revenue growth of 2.5% to 4.5% for the full year 2026.
Ingersoll Rand targets an adjusted EPS range of $3.45 to $3.57 for the full year 2026.
Ingersoll Rand aims for an adjusted EBITDA range of $2,130 to $2,190 million for the full year 2026.
Why it matters: Meeting or exceeding the EPS target would confirm strong earnings performance.
Confirms:Adjusted EPS reported at $3.45 or higher for Q2.
Disproves:Adjusted EPS reported below $3.45 for Q2.
Why it matters: Maintaining guidance shows confidence in future sales. Any change could signal trouble.
Confirms:Management says full-year 2026 revenue growth guidance is the same.
Disproves:Management cuts revenue growth guidance for the full year 2026.
Why it matters: A return to growth in the sector could boost Ingersoll Rand's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth speeds up to nearly 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth slows down to below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: If organic revenue growth stabilizes, it will help Ingersoll Rand meet its revenue goals.
Confirms:Q2 organic revenue growth reported at 0% or better compared to Q1.
Disproves:Q2 organic revenue growth was worse than -2%. This shows a continued decline.
Why it matters: A better EBITDA margin shows that the company is more efficient and makes more money.
Confirms:The adjusted EBITDA margin was above 25.4% for Q2.
Disproves:The adjusted EBITDA margin was below 25.4% for Q2.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION On February 12, 2026, Ingersoll Rand, Inc. (“Ingersoll Rand”) issued a press release announcing financial results for the full year and quarter ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including exhibits, is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to
Director — Jerome Guillen: Appointment of Jerome Guillen as a new director and member of committees.
Senior Vice President PST Segment, Demand Generation and Execution — Michael Weatherred: Mr. Michael Weatherred's role was expanded to include leadership of the PST segment.